Learning to Read

I was once told that there was a traditional Jewish practice that forbade the reading of Ezekiel prior to age 40. I think of that as optimistic. I also think that the modern mind is unable to fathom the notion that reading is anything other than a neutral activity. At most, we reason, there might be information that I cannot understand. Rarely do we believe that information can be harmful.

It can kill you. It can plunge your mind into the outer darkness. Reading is dangerous.

The German poet, Goethe, famously wrote, “Der Zauberlehrling,” a poem most will know from Walt Disney’s “The Sorcerer’s Apprentice.” In it, a sorcerer’s apprentice becomes bored with his chores and uses a spell to enchant the bucket and broom to do the work on their own. However, things get out of control. The apprentice chops the broom in two in order to stop it, but, instead, it becomes multiple brooms. Mickey Mouse demonstrates the chaos in his usual brilliant fashion. When the old sorcerer returns (in Goethe’s poem) he says that none but the Master should dare to summon the broom.

In the Mickey Mouse world of modernity, everyone fancies himself a Master.

In Goethe’s poem, there is a wonderful line: “Die ich rief, die Geister, / Werd’ ich nun nicht los” (“The spirits that I summoned / I now cannot rid myself of”). We are awash in a sea of spirits, summoned by our own arrogance and foolishness. Dostoevsky portrays this same madness in his well-named book, The Demons.

All of this from reading? Yes, when we read the wrong things at the wrong time.  The soul is a spiritually delicate thing, easily damaged and slow to heal. Modernity has an arrogance concerning almost everything. We imagine ourselves to be the wisest and most clever people within all of history, constantly telling ourselves that we know better than all who have gone before. As such, we think nothing of cherry-picking ideas, assuming that we understand them and have their mastery.

Valeria Alfeyeva, the mother of Met. Hilarion Alfeyev, wrote a very captivating semi-autobiographical spiritual novel, Pilgrimage to Dhzvari. It relates the story of a woman coming to grips with faith in the waning days of the Soviet Union. She finds herself and her son at a monastery in Georgia that is in the process of being restored and rebuilt. The abbot is deeply insightful. I was struck in my reading when the abbot becomes very upset with her after learning that she has read St. Maximus the Confessor. He wonders if she can possibly be saved! His advice is that she should read no more in a day than she prays.

I know of far darker stories. Orthodoxy, at present, is inundated with inquirers. The parish to which I’m attached will have received around 100 new members in this calendar year alone. It is a story that is being duplicated all across our culture. With inquiry comes the deep temptation to leap forward to the “deeper” things, to look for a mastery that cannot be found on the internet or in a book. Self-appointed apologists, without training or accountability, offer a knowledge that they themselves do not possess. We are not saved by information – quite often, we are destroyed by it.

What is so dangerous? The knowledge of God is personal and relational, not academic. God cannot be studied like a lab rat under a microscope, nor is theology a philosophical system, a simple matter of ideas. Those statements which we describe as “dogma” are, to quote Fr. Georges Florovsky, “verbal icons.” All of these things exist as God-given gifts that enable us to enter into union with Christ, in body, mind, and soul. It is a marriage between the self and God.

There are very sensitive aspects of the soul that must be given proper regard as we approach God. If, for example, our knowledge of God does not result in an increasing love of our enemies, then we are in delusion. If, for example, our knowledge of God does not result in an increasing knowledge of the self (including, especially, its most shameful aspects), then it is delusional.

I regularly see discussions on the internet of some of the deepest mysteries of the faith – often treated with the same casual treatment of philosophical topics. We debate what we should, in fact, simply adore. “Orthodoxy” does not mean “right teaching.” Its best translation is “right glory,” that is, “right worship.”

It is in worship, in true adoration, that we come to know God. It is in that same apprehension of the true and living God that we come to know ourselves, and encounter ourselves in abhorrence. It is something that we cannot approach lightly. Such knowledge can crush us. For, at the very time we abhor ourselves, we must know the true depths of God’s love. Otherwise, such knowledge would be unbearable.

Christ spoke to His disciples, James and John, who wanted to sit at His right and left hand. “Are you able?” He asked.

The same question can be asked of the Scriptures and of the writings and teachings of the Church. Are we able? Is it time? Am I ready? Do I truly want to enter into union with God through Christ?

He is a loving God and has, from the beginning, given us the fullness of His Church to guide us into that union. We cannot do these things alone, nor as masters. May God give us patience – for “in patience you will gain your soul.” (Lk. 21:19) Read sparingly, and for the sake of your soul rather than for the sake of information. Read for correction rather than mastery. Don’t forget to pray.

 

About Fr. Stephen Freeman

Fr. Stephen is a retired Archpriest of the Orthodox Church in America. He is also author of Everywhere Present: Christianity in a One-Storey Universe, and Face to Face: Knowing God Beyond Our Shame, as well as the Glory to God podcast series on Ancient Faith Radio.



Posted

in

by

Comments

25 responses to “Learning to Read”

  1. Ann Dibble Avatar
    Ann Dibble

    “The knowledge of God is personal and relational, not academic.” I am a learner, not a teacher, but this fits my experience.

    Every six or twelve months or so, my teacher drops a word into my life–apophatic….theosis…–that makes all the difference. One only needs enough understanding to be going on with.

  2. Helen Avatar
    Helen

    Our culture is all about consuming from the same tree as Adam and Eve. With the original story they were tempted with “nah, you won’t die”. Today it seems like my temptation is different, but still leading to the same result.

  3. NANCY HOLLOWAY Avatar
    NANCY HOLLOWAY

    One of your best.

  4. Rob Avatar
    Rob

    I have always been a curious person who has devoured so much content over the years. It’s only been in recent years that I can begin to understand and appreciate what is being said here and the value of boundaries and restraint, even with good content. I’ve experienced the glut of information and have fallen victim to “amusing myself to death” with it. It’s like an overconsumption of calories that the body can no longer access for energy to live and it becomes detrimental to health and makes it harder to move. It’s a daily fight to overcome these evil forces that want to prey on our propensity towards addiction to knowledge as a substitute for KNOWING Christ. God help us.

    Christ IS the Word!

  5. Patrick Avatar
    Patrick

    I am not qualified to judge the preparedness of others, but I admit I often wonder every time someone tells me they are reading the Ladder of Divine Ascent if they really should be. I was not when I first tried and it was spiritually discouraging if not damaging.

  6. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Patrick,
    My own recommendation is to read reliable secondary sources. Even then, some are much better than others. A good secondary source, in which the primary source is discussed and digested (as it were), is like having something of a mentor.

  7. Dee of Sts Herman and Olga Avatar
    Dee of Sts Herman and Olga

    Father,
    It is so rare that we would read anything that would enable us to see ourselves in truth, where we would abhor what we see in ourselves and witness the love of God and His mercy.

    I hear so often that we should love ourselves and put ourselves first. To be candid, this was not what my Seminole mother taught me. In her culture, humility comes first.

  8. susan anne webster Avatar
    susan anne webster

    Such precious insights.
    How I appreciate your loving, well lived experience’s that you generously share.
    May they continue and may you be blessed.

  9. Dn. Peter Avatar
    Dn. Peter

    Well spoken Father!

  10. AR Avatar
    AR

    As one among the many converting at the moment, I’ve developed a hunger for reading anything I can get my hands on, and what I’ve discovered about myself is that I retain very little information. Not because I don’t understand what I’m reading but the amount leaves my brain scattered – I don’t sit long enough to actually learn anything. By the time I pick up the next book, I’ve lost what I gleaned from the previous. This has led me to realize that all I’m doing is gathering info, not knowledge. I’m thinking I’d be better served by focusing on reading the lives of the saints.

  11. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    AR,
    That’s a very good piece of learning and self-reflection.

  12. Dee of Sts Herman and Olga Avatar
    Dee of Sts Herman and Olga

    AR,
    Like you, I found reading the lives of the saints very helpful and still do. Early on in my catechism, a priest encouraged me to read Father Sophrony’s book on Saint Silouan the Anthonite. Not only did I find it edifying, but it also helped open my mind to how to live an Orthodox life, knowing that while I am not a saint, his life provided an aspiration. He was a monk, but we are all called to live a deeper life abiding in Christ. Ultimately, this comes from prayer (like what Father Stephen writes); it isn’t something gleaned from scholarly theological or philosophical reading.

    Christ himself mentions a very simple (yet difficult) approach: prayer and fasting. (Mark 9:23-29) In our weakness, we need the help of Christ to believe, to go deeper in prayer and asceticism.

  13. Nathan Avatar
    Nathan

    Father, bless.

    In the past, I thought of discernment in terms of sifting information. To be discerning meant to discard bad ideas and retain good ideas. I know that’s not it now, but I think that’s how we often think about discernment. Realizing that some things aren’t meant for me was a pretty big moment for me. While I have some seminary training, I’m very grateful for the popular level books that are being released right now, as so much of what I was able to find when I first became Orthodox was predominantly monastic literature. It didn’t occur to me until years later that those books might have a place in my life – but not yet.

    We often talk about the importance of discernment, but then I’d hazard a guess that most of us don’t have the follow up thought that I, myself, may lack discernment and not even realize it. None of us know what we don’t know, and we may be blissfully unaware that we don’t know it. Can you say something about what discernment is and how we can obtain it and exercise it?

  14. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Nathan,
    There’s a humility involved in discernment (whereas we generally think of it as being born of mastery). The lack of mastery in our culture very often brings shame (some more than others). Humility is the ability to “bear a little shame” – as St. Sophrony taught. Discernment is certainly the ability to see the good and the bad and to tell the difference. But often, there’s a “not yet” rather than a good and bad.

    There is also the discernment that is seeing the truth about ourselves in the presence of God – seeing ourselves as we truly are and not as we’d like to be, much less as we pretend to be. St. James (I think) said, “Be not many teachers.” It’s a frightful thing to be appointed to teach.

    It is good for us to do small things – to be as children.

  15. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Dee,
    Are there other works that you would recommend? I like the contemporary books, Father Arseny and the follow-up volume.

  16. Dee of Sts Herman and Olga Avatar
    Dee of Sts Herman and Olga

    Father,
    I love your own books.

    In addition to these, Wounded by Love by St Porphyrios, The Garden of the Holy Spirit by Elder Iakovos, St Seraphim of Sarov (Valentine Zander), but also Archimandrite Zacharias books.

    I’ve been reading and rereading Archim. Zacharias books a lot lately. Specifically Remember Your First Love. He often tells stories about conversations he had with St Sophrony. These conversations I find so helpful because I’m so often at loss with how to deal with my failures to living a life in Christ. Daily failures.

    We just finished a fast. And it may sound superstitious but it seems every time I break a fast during a fast, or accept or give myself an excuse to break a fast during a time of fasting something upsetting or painful thing happens. Whether this synchronicity is real or not, I feel an admonition in my heart to be true to the fast for my soul and for the well being of others.

    I hope this is ok to mention here. Our model is Christ and even while I know I will fail, and not mirror His model, I have hope that He will strengthen me by His presence. I pray to accept the suffering of my failure and keep following Him downward, as Archim. Zacharias would say.

    I think over the years that I have been Orthodox some of the life giving ways such as prayer and fasting seem so simple and yet proven to be profound and life saving.

    I’ve spent such a long part of my life not seeking Him, hearing a knock but not opening the door. It’s hard now for me to imagine how that was my life. It’s hard now to imagine how I could live through what I have gone through lately without Him.

    Glory to God for His mercy.

  17. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Dee,
    Thank you for the list. Fr. Zacharias’ works are a true treasure (as is he himself!). One of the unusual aspects of St. Sophrony’s monastery in Essex (the Monastery of St. John the Baptist) is that of a “double monastery” – with both men and women. They are separated by a road, but the chapel is shared by both. Their refectories are separate. There is a gentle aspect to the monastery that is wonderfully balanced.

    May God give us grace in our stumbles – just as He gives us the grace to stand. I’m beginning to see old age as a sort of fasting – one that is inescapable.

  18. Joanie Miller Avatar
    Joanie Miller

    Father Stephen , What do you think about CSLewis ‘s advice about reading primary sources? ( “There is a strange idea that in every subject the ancient books should be read only by the professionals, and that the amateur should content himself with the modern books. Thus I have found as a tutor in English Literature that if the average student wants to find out something about Platonism, the very last thing he thinks of doing is to take a translation of Plato off the library shelf and read the Symposium. He would rather read some dreary modern book ten times as long, all about ‘isms’ and influences and only once in twelve pages telling him what Plato actually said. The error is rather an amiable one, for it springs from humility. The student is half afraid to meet one of the great philosophers face to face. He feels himself inadequate and thinks he will not understand him. But if he only, the great man, just because of his greatness, is much more intelligible than his modern commentator. The simplest student will be able to understand, if not all, yet a very great deal of what Plato said; but hardly anyone can understand some modern books on Platonism. It has always therefore been one of my endeavors as a teacher to persuade the young that firsthand knowledge is not only more worth acquiring than secondhand knowledge, but is usually much easier and more delightful to acquire.”[1])
    I have been influenced greatly in this idea. Thanks for your insights in this matter. Joanie

  19. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Joanie,
    Reading primary sources is, no doubt, a good thing. Frankly, I find that our present state of education is just abysmal (particularly if compared to England at the time of Lewis’ writing). People often need some sort of reliable guide to understand primary writings. I wish it weren’t so, but it too often is. I majored in Greek and Latin in college, took Hebrew in Seminary, so I’ve enjoyed ancient authors in their most primary form. But I still like a good commentary when I can get it.

    I think one thing that was helpful to me was to see the variety of ways that ancients handled texts…how they read things. I believe that very few today have a feel for what counts as “Scripture.” We’ve distorted it terribly (mostly through Protestant influences).

    I have to say that Lewis’ lectures on reading older literature – such as his The Discarded Image – is tremdously helpful. It’s almost a necessity to read prior to delving into Medieval literature. All of which is ironic.

  20. Jenny Avatar
    Jenny

    Father,

    I have a little bit of time. I have been reading and appreciating your articles. This made me think of the first time I attempted to read the Scriptures after ten years of so. Growing up, the Scriptures were presently exactly how the “prophet” of the church had explained them. We were taught that we and only we had the whole truth of Christianity, that we knew and expressed the highest will of God.

    As usual in these sorts of organizations, fear and shame were used regularly to keep people from questioning anything. Only the “prophet” knew exactly what God meant. If anyone taught anything different, it must be from the enemy, for example, and we would be led astray, deceived and injured.

    Everything in the Scriptures was read through this lens. Christ’s parable where He teaches that those who knew their Master’s will and did not do it will receive the greater punishment then those who did not know and didn’t do it, was meant exactly for us, for example. We knew “all of His will,” and if we fell away from any of these teachings, our punishment from the Lord would be worse than for anyone else.

    So attempting to read the Scriptures by myself after growing up in this environment was extremely difficult. Everything that I read, including the Lord’s own words, seemed to be telling me only what the church had taught. That was why eventually, on that day, I gave up and went back to the 10th chapter of St. John, which was then the only place where I felt I could hear the Lord’s voice when He said things like, “I am the Good Shepherd, and I know My sheep and am known by them.”

    Eventually I made my way to the Old Testament and that was even more difficult. I had reached Ezekiel and was genuinely terrified. The “prophet” made much of the apocalyptic writings and it wasn’t a far-off thing for us, growing up. We had stores of food put away for the end of the world, rows and rows of canned goods.

    Growing up, it was extremely important to understand all of these things exactly- to know exactly what everything meant in order to please God, to stay in God’s will and survive in one way or another.

    But now I knew nothing. I did not understand what anything meant. It was during this time that I was able to perceive the presence of the Lord Jesus around me all of the time- it was His presence alone that made it possible for me to read these passages at all.

    When I reached out to Jesus in fear and in urgency to understand, He told me that I didn’t need to understand it, because nothing depending upon my personal understanding of those prophecies. Everything was on Him. The government, one might say, was on His shoulders. He knew what it meant, when it would occur, what it would look like, and His power and His wisdom would bring it about just exactly as He willed.

    Furthermore, even during those times, even if I went through them, or if they were occurring now, all that mattered was that my life was hidden in His. All of the time and in everything that played out, my life was safely tucked away in Him, like a little chick that is carried somewhere in the fold of a cloak while the person goes about their business, about which they are perfectly capable and cognizant. I have never forgotten the peace and relief of understanding this concept.

    The Lord had to explain many such things like that to me. The first time I read in St. John where He says in exasperation, “Why is it that you can’t understand a word I am saying?” And it’s because they do not know Him or His Father. I was absolutely terrified! I thought to myself, “This is the reason why I can’t understand what He is saying! I am not even of the Lord! I am…” But I could not finish the thought, because it was so unthinkable.

    But the Lord reminded me of how He had said to His disciples that He had many things to say to them, but they couldn’t bear them yet, and that it was the same with me, and so He was carrying that knowledge with Him until I could bear the weight. Then He reminded me of how the disciples on the road to Emmaus didn’t understand either, and how He had to open their understanding to the things in the Scriptures. So I was not alone in the experience of needing to wait for Him to open my understanding. It did not mean that I did not belong to Him.

    I have almost run out of time and this is very long already, but you can see how I relate to what you are saying in this article, and I have not yet talked about the dangers also in abhorring oneself. You wrote:

    “It is in that same apprehension of the true and living God that we come to know ourselves, and encounter ourselves in abhorrence. It is something that we cannot approach lightly. Such knowledge can crush us. For, at the very time we abhor ourselves, we must know the true depths of God’s love. Otherwise, such knowledge would be unbearable.”

    My goodness, Father! How do you know these things? The Tradition that knows these things, and the Church knows them because they are true. I have experienced just this, and it can be dangerous. Being in His presence because of Who He is makes a betrayal of Him seem so horrendous that it was causing me to abhor myself for my past sins. But also, in His presence, His love prevented me from fleeing away from Him and putting myself in exile, one might say.

    Specifically, He reminded me first of all that He doesn’t remember it anymore. He doesn’t bring it to mind. So He didn’t even remember the very thing that was tormenting me.

    And also, though He had “become sin,” not just in general, but mine- the thought of which was unbearable to me at the time, that I added to His suffering- but because He had become sin, I was now a part of Him. And if I took myself away from Him after He had already accomplished the pain and suffering, then I took from Him the joy that was set before Him. And if I loved Him, how could I do that? How could I leave Him with only the suffering of love and not receive also the joy at the end?

    This was so compelling that despite my shame, I did not depart. For His sake alone, I stayed to worship and adore Him, though I was not worthy even to be within seventy thousand miles of Him. But He doesn’t want us at a distance.

    I must wrap this up now, because I must go pray. 🙂 Thank you for your writing, Father.

  21. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Jenny,
    Thank you for this sharing. The “tyranny” of various false prophets is truly tragic. In Orthodoxy, we generally describe this as spiritual abuse – using spiritual authority to control others – especially with fear and shame. What little I know I have learned by slow experience with lots of stumbles. God has been patient with me – and I’ve been blessed with a very solid, stable marriage to a good Christian soul.

    May God give us the grace to know His love and to be courageous in our strange days.

  22. Jenny Avatar
    Jenny

    Father,

    God is very patient with us, isn’t He? It took me a long time to accept that we learn things slowly, often stumbling. Because that is not at all what was drummed into me for the first eighteen years. I was taught that we must accept, memorize and obey completely the whole truth as given without stumbling and with great, constant effort and never to let one piece of it drop or we would not only lose God’s approval, but incur His deadly wrath.

    When I think back to that time in my life, when I finally found the courage to try and relearn what the Scriptures might be saying, what the Lord might be saying, I feel overwhelmed all over again with the task and the emotional baggage!

    But the Lord is so patient and kind- “A bruised reed He will not break, and a smoldering wick He will not snuff out. In faithfulness He will bring forth justice…” In those early years, I thought of this verse often.

    I went back and read the Wikipedia article on the “prophet” that started the movement I was born into. Tyrant is a perfect word for him. It is disturbing reading. His name was Frank W. Sandford.

    He was long gone by the time I was born, though I knew people who had known him personally- grandfathers had known him. My own great grandfather was one of the original members of the church. Frank Sandford was involved with several trials- some for manslaughter for various tragic, terrible reasons which I won’t go into here, but at one point, he was hiding from the law at my great grandfather’s dairy farm in upstate New York. Because Mr. Sandford thought of himself as Elijah, he called my great grandfather “Obadiah,” after the person in the Bible who had hidden Elijah.

    The movement was on their third leader by the time I was born, a gentle man who tried to move the church away from the disturbing past and toward more classical “evangelical” Christianity. The worst of the excesses of the movement had already occurred by that time.

    My Gospel reading has me in St. John now and this time, I am remembering again what it sounded like the first time I had tried rereading it, fifteen years ago. The thing which captivated me the most about the Lord at that time was His steadfast strength in saying and doing only those things that His Father told Him to say and do, no matter what came against the Lord, or how He was insulted or provoked. He never sought His own glory; He never tried to establish Himself in men’s eyes. He didn’t look for honor from men, as He says at one point.

    I thought, what Person has this kind of strength? Who is this Person who can do this?

    A few days ago, I was at the part where He opens the eyes of the man born blind and it struck me that the blind man never asks the Lord to heal him. The disciples notice the man and ask the Lord about him, and the Lord says that neither he nor his parents sinned that he was born blind, but that the work of God might be displayed in him.

    What a thing for that blind man to hear about himself! After all, like all of us, he was certainly a sinner. He must have been all that time assuming that it was his parents or his own fault. Now suddenly light breaks though in this unlooked for direction. His suffering, his blindness, all along were meant to give God glory. This makes him a gift from God the Father to God the Son.

    What an extraordinary reason to be born! This must transform his whole idea of the suffering he had endured. And he was so confused, poor man. Just as soon as he can physically see and can enter into his community, he is thrown out for giving his testimony about the Lord.

    But his whole trust is in Jesus, even when he doesn’t really know who this Person is. “Do you believe in the Son of Man?” Jesus asked him.

    “Tell me who he is and I will,” the man replies. He is ready to believe anything the Lord tells him, because the Lord has his whole heart. The man born blind is already following the Lord and he doesn’t even know Who He is.

    Because he is one of the Lord’s own sheep and he has heard His Good Shepherd’s voice speaking in the darkness of his life even before his eyes were opened. And when he does know, when he hears that the very Person speaking to him is the Son of Man, that he in in fact seeing Him right now, he falls down and worships the Lord.

    And I am quite sure that this man never stops following his Good Shepherd all the days of his life, that he follows very closely at His feet, and is grateful always for the suffering that was an occasion to give glory to the One that he loves.

    “Give glory to God!” the Pharisees insist. Well, thank God, he does.

  23. AR Avatar
    AR

    Father and Dee,

    Thank you for the book recommendations. The book on St Silouan comes up over and over again as one I should read. This past Pascha I read “Saint Nektarios: The Saint of Our Century” after having watched Man of God. I was very moved by his life and humility. His trials having come from within the Church and how he responded to them was very sobering for me.

  24. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    AR,
    There has never been a time or place in Church history in which moral corruption, of one sort or another, and the abuse of power, have been in absence. At the same time, there have been great saints. It interests me that the Church has remained faithful despite such trials. The liturgy, I think, has sustained us and nurtured us, and allowed us to survive one another, bishops, and priests, while nurturing us with saints, among whom have been some bishops and priests.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Subscribe to blog via email

Support the work

Your generous support for Glory to God for All Things will help maintain and expand the work of Fr. Stephen. This ministry continues to grow and your help is important. Thank you for your prayers and encouragement!


Latest Comments

  1. Thank you Fr. Stephen, and all for this comment section. This has given me much to think and pray about.…

  2. Fr. Stephen, Nikolas, I am thinking out loud. I have a tendency to want to place hell beyond the particulars…

  3. Nikolaos, I am not willing to say what is the case ultimately. There is enough disagreement (here and there) on…

  4. Simon Understanding that Christ is both heaven and hell, depending on how each one will perceive him in his second…


Read my books

Everywhere Present by Stephen Freeman

Listen to my podcast



Categories


Archives