You Do Not Have a Modern Heart

You do not have a modern heart.

Regardless of what any of us might think of modernity – love it, hate it, mistrust it, cheer it – it is not the stuff of which we are made. Like all cultures of every time, modernity is fleeting, nothing more than a puff of wind. Who we are and what we are, that which can be captured by the phrase, “the heart,” is rooted and grounded in eternity. It transcends even the time in which we are born and live. “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you…” (Jer. 1:5) This is important for our self-understanding and in our knowledge of God.

There is this from St. Gregory of Nyssa:

The journey towards salvation is marked by a successive elimination of all that we “have,” in order to reach what we “are.” The safest path and surest refuge is not to be deluded and fail to recognize ourselves – who we truly are. We should not believe that we are seeing our Selves when we are only seeing something that surrounds us – our body, our senses, the idea that others have of us.

For anything unstable [that which changes] is not us.

The soul is purified in this way, as she lays aside garment after garment. So, the ideal [salvation] will appear as that supreme instant wherein the soul, having laid aside all of her “corporeal” veils, presents herself naked and pure in spirit to the vision of God in a divine vigil. (Paraphrased by Von Balthasar in Presence and Thought, 1995.)

I remember some years ago being engaged in conversations regarding the role that culture “should” play in theology. The idea that was being presented (with which I disagreed) was that as culture changes, so theology should change as well. It was suggested that culture was something “incarnational” – that it should enjoy a privileged position as though it were comparable to Scripture. That argument has actually carried the day within the liberal protestant denominations. To be accurate, the argument was disingenuous, in that it was merely a justification for a process that was already well underway.

It would be tragic if the same process were to be adopted by an individual and interpreted as “discovering the true self.” A thermometer tells you the temperature of the air around you but says nothing about whether it is breathable.

St. Gregory recognized that who we are is not that which surrounds us, nor even the various “corporeal veils,” the signals sent to us by our bodies. We are not a social construct. The heart (which is also described as the “nous,” the “eye of the soul”) is at the very core of our being. It is the faculty by which we perceive God. It is in the communion between God and the self that we truly reside: it is the “who” of our existence. We are a communion of fullness in our union with God. This is not a “religious” abstraction – it is a description of the true character of our being, of our relating to all things. It is the description of our life as grounded in communion, with all and through all.

Culture is ephemeral, constantly changing and adapting itself to circumstances and various transient forces. There is no permanence in any culture. The nature of our human existence, at its truest and greatest depth, has a timeless character. Human beings today, compared to human beings of 10,000 years ago, are the same. We are created in the image and likeness of God, and this remains the truth of our existence.

St. Gregory speaks of “laying aside garment after garment” in a work of purification that drives us towards the vision of God. Of course, some garments are easier to lay aside than others. Certain garments of wrong-doing are probably the easiest to identify. There are other garments that we have long mistaken for our very identity. These are not easily removed (just as they are not easily identified). It is perhaps helpful to know that we do not know who we are until God Himself tells us. When Christ says to Simon-Bar-Jonah, “You are Peter [a rock], and on this rock I will build my Church,” we are witnessing just such a revelation. It is not a relating of ecclesiastical position. I suspect that only Peter himself could tell us its true meaning – and it required his entire lifetime to make that discovery.

The garment of St. Paul’s false identity likely began to fall away at the very moment that he was thrown from his horse on the road to Damascus. He describes a number of later sufferings:

From the Jews five times I received forty stripes minus one. Three times I was beaten with rods; once I was stoned; three times I was shipwrecked; a night and a day I have been in the deep; in journeys often, in perils of waters, in perils of robbers, in perils of my own countrymen, in perils of the Gentiles, in perils in the city, in perils in the wilderness, in perils in the sea, in perils among false brethren; in weariness and toil, in sleeplessness often, in hunger and thirst, in fastings often, in cold and nakedness — 2 Cor. 11:24-27

He is ultimately able to write:

I am crucified with Christ, nevertheless I live; yet, not I, but Christ lives in me. And the life that I now live, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me (Gal. 2:20)

Very few endure such hardships, though I suspect that the inner scourgings that many endure are even more difficult to bear.

For St. Paul, there is an image towards which he moves: the crucified Christ “who loved me and gave Himself for me.” It is that knowledge, that fullness of communion, that allows him to lay aside the weight of anything that holds him back. At its very heart, you can hear the soul’s voice of love.

There are very few epochs in human history that have endured greater assaults on fundamental human realities than our own. It is little wonder that “identity” has become a watchword and a battleground. St. Gregory’s imagery of “laying aside” the veils is a patient work and a gift of grace. It is important to remember that we are not creating the true self – it is being discovered and revealed. More important still is the fact that this true heart exists in the image and likeness of God.

But we all, with unveiled face, beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, just as by the Spirit of the Lord.

Our attention is rightly directed towards the prototype, the image and glory of God revealed in the face of Jesus Christ, rather than towards ourselves. Love God. Love your neighbor. Move beyond the veils.

About Fr. Stephen Freeman

Fr. Stephen is a retired Archpriest of the Orthodox Church in America. He is also author of Everywhere Present: Christianity in a One-Storey Universe, and Face to Face: Knowing God Beyond Our Shame, as well as the Glory to God podcast series on Ancient Faith Radio.



Posted

in

by

Comments

40 responses to “You Do Not Have a Modern Heart”

  1. Rob Avatar
    Rob

    Good news, indeed!

  2. Dan Avatar
    Dan

    Father Stephen,

    Wonderful article with lots to contemplate in humility. I was confused by one part, and please this is not an attempt to debate but asking for clarification.

    You stated: “It is perhaps helpful to know that we do not know who we are until God Himself tells us.”

    Then you followed it with: “ “You are Peter [a rock], and on this rock I will build my Church,” we are witnessing just such a revelation.”

    But then you clam: “It is not a relating of ecclesiastical position.”

    Is not part of Peter’s identity ecclesial as he was an apostle? So how is it that this aspect of his being is excluded from the revelation of Christ?

    Additionally context, I am Catholic, but I find both the Catholic and Orthodox arguments on this challenging in different ways. So I am asking not in a polemical way but to seek understanding.

    Thank you.

  3. Matthew Avatar
    Matthew

    Hello Dan. I too am Catholic. Welcome.

  4. Michael Fietsam Avatar
    Michael Fietsam

    “Beloved, we are sons of God even now, and what we shall be hereafter, has not been made known as yet. But we know that when he comes we shall be like him; we shall see him, then, as he is.” 1John 3:2
    Behind and after all the veils.

  5. Margaret Avatar
    Margaret

    Thank you, Fr. Stephen!

  6. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Dan,
    Like you, I have no interest in arguing my point. But, I do not believe there to be a “Petrine Ministry” in the Church (I believe that the Pope is, at most, Bishop of Rome, and, at most, would be “first among equals” as we Orthodox say of the Patriarch of Constantinople. My reasons are pretty straight-forward: I do not believe that there was a Petrine ministry in the early Church, it evolved later in the West, and second, such a ministry does not make theological sense to me.

    But, Peter was certainly an Apostle, and carried out that Apostolic ministry in a number of places, Rome being the last of them. Orthodoxy associates the “rock” aspect of the Christ’s statement to apply to all Bishops.

    In St. Peter’s case, I see something of his personal story unfolding first in the Scriptures (the denial of Christ, then his restoration by the Sea of Galilee, and lastly, according to tradition, his acceptance of martyrdom, when he was again seeking to run away. That last action was, I think, his full embrace of his identity as Petros, a rock.

    I hope that helps…

  7. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Dan,
    I did not mean to give offense on the topic of Peter’s ecclesiological position – but simply to read the text in an Orthodox manner. It is, as you note, something about which we disagree.

  8. Dan Avatar
    Dan

    Thank you Father Stephen. No offense taken! I’m simply a layman who tries to conform to the mind of the Church, key word try. Fortunately, I’ve come to accept my ability to “get it” isn’t really necessary for salvation. So I assume we see some parts of this topic differently, but as I originally said, I don’t really see either “mainstream” claim of the Petrine ministry at least in their extreme forms – that is king of the Church (my words here not actual dogmatic language) or ceremonial figurehead (again my words here not an accusation) – as the case in the Gospels, early church, or really even for the first ~1800 years. So truthfully, just thought I’d ask for clarification, not intending to argue or expecting a “thoroughly Catholic” reply. Because as I read that specific part of your article the thought I had was that the naming from Christ and the revelation of one’s true self (in this case Peter) is total, and touches all of oneself, not partial. Now what that implies, that’s the tricky part.

    Also, a quick thank you that fits this conversation for me. I hold onto remembering something I read here on your blog years ago: “it is not my mission to save the Church, rather the Church’s mission to save me.” Seems fitting for confusing topics.

    Sorry if I took the conversation off topic. Dropping this in the comments not with the intent to drag the comments off track only to reply, and thank you for your response.

  9. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Dan,
    Perhaps I can say a bit more. Having spent some years within Orthodox culture, I’ve been struck by its habit of language – it loves epithets, titles, exaggerations, and hyperbole. On Archbishop I knew, told me that during one point in his ministry, when he had oversight for the Albanian diocese in the OCA, his title (an Albanian one) was “Master of the Universe.” We both laughed. I think I know what the original Greek would have been behind that translation, and it’s not quite so over-the-top, but it was not surprising.

    If you ever have a chance to read a letter from one of the Patriarchs (particularly Constantinople) its language is equally effusive and over-wrought (by our standards). It’s just a cultural things – no doubt, an inheritance from the Court of Byzantium.

    That’s to say, that many of the uses of titles and such found in some of the Eastern Fathers (referring to Rome, eg.) should, I think, be read in this same courtly manner. The West, and its later apologists, tended to take all such titles and read them as juridical definitions, which is a mistake.

    It’s equally a mistake, I think, to take Christ’s conversation with St Peter into a juridical pronouncement about later Bishops of Rome. It does not fit with the evidence in the New Testament (no particular deference is shown other than St. Paul’s rather derogotory description of the “superfine Apostles” in Jerusalem). Theories of petrine doctrine seem to develop later historically (in my reading).

    For what it’s worth, Orthodoxy has lots of trouble with the relationships between Churches, Patriarchs, and such, and it’s a source of scandal even into the present. I press forward with how I best understand the Tradition, in obedience to my bishop, and leave the larger messes to God’s providential solutions. I’ve seen that the Church is indeed saving me…and for that I am grateful.

    May God grant us all grace.

  10. Dan Avatar
    Dan

    Thank you Father. And again I’m sorry, I understand this was not the intent of your reflection and I don’t mean to take this conversation off track. I appreciate your ability to really strike at the heart of things and constantly pointing out the hydra of modernity. Thank you again.

  11. Ook Avatar
    Ook

    Dear Father,
    If the soul is created and mutable, is it possible that even our sense of being an ‘irreducible I’ is something given to us rather than the ultimate ground? And if so, does the ‘I’ that is saved remain forever finite and made, or does it somehow transcend the conditioned?

  12. Patricia Avatar
    Patricia

    The journey towards salvation is marked by a successive elimination of all that we “have,” in order to reach what we “are.”

    I am experiencing such a loss, a personal crisis, . . dare I say an “elimination” ?!? And I do not like what I find in myself . . . “what we are”. . . what I AM!!!!
    shallow … faithless … hopeless … so deep in grief and confusion that I can hardly pray.
    Veil by veil . . . but I do not like what is underneath it all. I do not know what to do. How to pray. The challenge of believing that “in all unexpected circumstances . . .”
    Pray for me, a sinner

  13. Ook Avatar
    Ook

    Sorry, I guess I should explain that. My question above was inspired by your quote of St. Gregory regarding how “the soul is purified…as she lays aside garment after garment.”

  14. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Ook,
    I think that for Gregory, the soul, in that most core sense, is immutable – able to be transfigured through union with Christ – but immutable [“that which changes is not us”]. St. Gregory was not an “Origenist” (as far as I know), but he was certainly influenced by Origen’s thought. Origen was rather Platonistic and saw the soul as eternal. St. Gregory does not teach that, but his sense of the soul has a bit of that flavor to it.

    This fits well, I believe, with the Church’s teaching that we are good by nature – that sin is extrinsic to us rather than intrinsic. This is quite strong in St. Dionysius the Areopagite. So, the “veils” are being taken away, include the constructs of sin.

  15. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Patricia,
    Beneath what you do not like, is something that will like – very much. Be patient. Pray to Christ and your guardian angel. It is said that our guardian angel is something of a “duplicate” (or image) of our self-in-perfection. Our guardian is unique to us. Ask it to guard you and guide you towards your hearts true home.

  16. Ook Avatar
    Ook

    Thank you Father, for the very subtle response.

    So the garments are sin and false constructs, not the soul itself, and the soul is immutable in core, but open to transfiguration because its ground is its union with God. In other words, the immutability is the stability of a vessel that is held. So maybe I can ask, what holds the vessel?

    In other words, when St. Paul says “not I, but Christ lives in me”, is the “Paul” who remains the same core person underneath? Or is the core replaced by the indwelling Christ?

  17. Dan Avatar
    Dan

    Not Father but the true self is not necessarily the same as the covered self which is the false self. I think of that phrase by St. Paul as the stripping away of the false ego, the desires and tendencies that separate us from Christ. But all the same we don’t lose ourselves either, meaning we aren’t replaced by Christ as in some Christian variance of Buddhism. Sorry if that reads as an accusation I don’t mean it that way, only as an example to help clarify what I’m trying to say. The true self exists, and it exists with Christ, but is not replaced by Christ. So the more we know Christ in humility, the more we know ourselves. Hopefully that helps.

  18. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Ook,
    It’s a very interesting image that St. Gregory uses. A veil or garment takes the shape of what it covers, and so, gives the mistaken possibility of identifying it with what lies beneath. The old saying in English goes, “The clothes make the man.” I think the outermost layers are sin, or perhaps most laden and mixed with sin. The deeper layers are harder to discern and are constructed of shame or pretense, and such.

    I note that in St. Paul’s statement, “I am crucified with Christ, nevertheless I live, yet not I but Christ lives in me…” there is a sort of playful dancing between the two identities. It’s Paul, but it’s Christ, nevertheless it’s Paul, yet it’s Christ… I think that in this we are reaching the boundaries where language can only point – it cannot truly go there. It is the reality of union – where if you say one thing, you must include the other, but the inclusion does not exclude, etc.

    An image that occurs to me in this is musical. Speech (talk) does not work for union. If two people talk at the same time, what results is cacophony – you can’t understand either one. However, if two people sing (perhaps in harmony), not only are they both heard, but the harmony seems greater than either voice. And, in the most excellent cases, the two voices seem as one (yet two, yet one, yet two, etc.). Musical experiences are, to my mind, some of the best examples and metaphors for communion or koinonia.

    As the the core person. It is Paul, Christ does not replace him. However, Christ fulfills him. He is no longer considered in isolation, but in fulfillment.

    It is as the persons of the Trinity. The Father is not without the Son, etc. St. Sophrony would describe this as “hypostatic” being.

  19. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Dan,
    See this last comment of mine to Ook. I think we’re of the same mind in this. I was just finishing my comment when yours appeared. Such timing!

  20. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    I would add a thought. The lyrical passage in Philippians where St. Paul cries out, “That I may know Him! The communion of His sufferings, and the power of His resurrection!” belongs to this same sort of imagery. It is expressive of the deepest part of the spiritual life. St. Paul, together with St. John, is hands down the most revealing revealer of the inner life. They both set a pattern that is repeated through the centuries in the works of saint after saint.

  21. Ook Avatar
    Ook

    Dear Father,
    As a former musician (returning to composition in my upcoming retirement) your musical image delights me. Although, I guess, as a former student of John Cage, my goal would not be to become a better-tuned instrument in a divine duet, but to know the silence in which the music happens.
    Thank you,

  22. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Ook,
    Apropos: the saying of St Ignatius of Antioch: “He who possesses in truth the word of Jesus can hear even its silence.

  23. Dee of Sts Herman and Olga Avatar
    Dee of Sts Herman and Olga

    Thank you all for this lively conversation. Glory to God!

  24. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Dee,
    There’s so much in these small Biblical quotes.

  25. Dee of Sts Herman and Olga Avatar
    Dee of Sts Herman and Olga

    Indeed Father!

  26. Margaret Sarah Avatar
    Margaret Sarah

    Father Stephen,

    I’ve been considering these ideas for a few days now. Specifically concerning culture, how do we approach the reality that there is “no such thing as a secular world”, as a previous article of yours so skillfully explains? Isn’t culture in some sense “incarnational”? Ephemeral, yes, but what is life in Christ if not the ephemeral subsumed into eternity?

    I might be missing something here, or misunderstanding.

  27. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Margaret,
    “Culture” is a very large term. There is, if you will, a sort of “basic” culture. Cooking, eating, cleaning, procuring, clothing, child-rearing, schooling, etc., are the sort of things that not only take place everywhere, every day, but always have. How the Japanese (for example) go about doing these things versus how the English go about doing these things differs wildly. But, if one were suddenly picked up from one culture and placed in the other, he would still have to go about these basic things, perhaps requiring the acquisition of new customs, etc. But the same necessary goals would be in place. They are demanded by our existence.

    There are many thousands of things, though, that (particularly in the modern world) attach themselves to these necessities and create a sort ephemeral level of culture that too easily displaces the actual necessities themselves.

    Interestingly, when Christ speaks about eating, and clothing, and such, we understand His sayings with no trouble, despite 2000 years of ephemeral changes and such. There is, it seems to me, a true “incarnational” aspect of culture and a sort of “ephemeral” aspect of culture. In a world of absurd material abundance and digital distraction, we often concentrate on the ephemeral aspect. The merely incarnational, I suspect, seems “boring” in a world where our very existence is sort of boring to us.

    Monastics, after a fashion, concentrate on the unadorned incarnational life – grounded in prayer and worship. When I write and say “there is no such thing as a secular world,” I mean by that that all things have their meaning and their existence only in relation to God. I’m not wanting to describe “ephemeral” things as somehow disincarnate or unrelated to God – but they can (in their constant multiplication) become distractions from that which is truly needful.

    No doubt, I could be more consistent with my language and much more clear in my explanations.

    Living simply is to live in a manner that is grounded in necessity more than in luxury, in the truly incarnational and not just our manufactured desires. It’s interesting to me that I have to look around to find the bread aisle in a grocery store, but the candy is always right there at the check-out counter.

    God give us grace.

  28. Matthew Avatar
    Matthew

    I too have been thinking a bit about culture.

    I think there is much in western culture (the only cultural I can really speak definitively about) which is good and true and beautiful and which has God as its creative center. A Bach violin sonata, a renaissance painting, and the Pietá are all excellent examples of this I think. These are not basic elements of culture, but belong to another level altogether – and if ephemeral, so what (though I don´t classify them personally as ephemeral)?

    My point is – don´t we need both basic and ephemeral aspects of culture taken in proper dosages so that we can experience God´s grace in all aspects of our lives?

  29. Margaret Sarah Avatar
    Margaret Sarah

    Father,

    Perhaps we could add a few items to the “basic” culture: dancing, music, celebrating the changes of the year, remembering our ancestors, feasting, etc. These are not “necessary” biologically, but they are necessary to maintaining a healthy culture, or perhaps even being human.

    My concern with “necessity” as being the marker of the incarnational is that joy, love, and certainly life itself are inherently superfluous. They do not exist by or for necessity. On the other hand, I totally get what you mean by “manufactured desires” and “living in luxury”. There’s something off there when a culture promotes that.

    Perhaps an unhealthy culture sells us a false self to hide behind – or shackles us to the veils, insisting that’s all there is. Perhaps one role of a healthy culture may be to “define the veils”. I guess I just may have some hope for “the ephemeral”: that it may, however weakly, reflect the eternal. A healthy culture encourages us into something deeper through the ephemeral.

  30. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Matthew,
    I hesitate to make “ephemeral” a hard and fast category. Beauty (Bach, the Pieta, etc.) are rooted in something that is not ephemeral – not at all like the kitsch images that constantly flash across our sight. We need beauty (as well as other things), as much as we need food. We’re not house plants. There is a “song” which the soul sings – that is the song of God. I think there are echoes of it in many things. The same is true of the image of God within the soul – we encounter it elsewhere as well.

    If I’m pressing forward with these thoughts in conversation, I would say that to “live well” is to live towards the image of God, towards the song of God, etc.. It requires that we learn to see. That we learn to listen. That we nurture within ourselves the skills required for such living.

  31. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Margaret Sarah,
    I think I likely made a poor choice in using “necessity” as the defining term. But, fwiw, love and joy are both necessary to our existence – without them, we die. The same is largely true of such things as celebration and feasting, dance, music, etc. Perhaps the most difficult aspect of modernity stems from its commodification of all things. Dance is natural, but our culture has lost most of its “natural” dance (at least in many of its corners). The same is true of celebration. They become commodities – productions.

    Many ethnic cultures have retained older forms of dance, food, celebration, etc., that are not commodified. But modernity tends towards pressing them in that direction. They become performances – done so that other people can watch – an exercise in which they lose their original meaning and purpose.

    To be truly human is a very rich things with great depth. The soul expresses the truth of its being in things that we describe as “culture.” It’s the falsification of culture (in which it becomes a “veil”) that is problematic. Love cannot be a commodity, and becomes something dark and dangerous when something attempts to make it so. The term “alienation” comes to mind when our lives are spent in the midst of commodities. We do not dance. We do not sing. We don’t know how to celebrate, etc.

    I think to myself that the very natural worship that is found in Orthodoxy today feels alien at first. Our culture has trained us to be an audience – to watch things rather than to be things. Perhaps the most dangerous thing about liturgizing in the modern world is the tendency (even among the Orthodox) to turn the Liturgy into a spectacle. I have resisted it for years.

    Life is to be lived, not watched. So, I’m still feeling for the right words.

  32. Margaret Sarah Avatar
    Margaret Sarah

    Oh, yes, I think “natural” works much better than “necessary”. Love, joy, and dancing are natural to humanity. The joy of observing a sunrise is different than simply observing that the day has begun, though the latter is still quite necessary in order to get work done.

  33. Jenny Avatar
    Jenny

    Father,

    You wrote:
    “For St. Paul, there is an image towards which he moves: the crucified Christ “who loved me and gave Himself for me.” It is that knowledge, that fullness of communion, that allows him to lay aside the weight of anything that holds him back. At its very heart, you can hear the soul’s voice of love.”

    I was thinking about that yesterday and today, specifically, the weight of failure. Lately, my own failure to be as good as I wish has sometimes held me back from moving toward Christ. Instead, I want to give up or at least, to fall asleep or to cease to put myself by faith always before Christ. To have enough perceived distance to be lulled into something half awake.

    I had a terrible day on Sunday, with a whole cascade of failures. As you know, political engagement on social media is my perennial weakness. Instead of trying to persuade people or engage at that level, I have chosen to give that up in order that I might at least try to acquire a spirit of Peace, so that I could pray instead.

    To that end, I gave up Facebook recently and have been moving along pretty evenly- some ups and downs but mostly moving forward. Until Sunday, when I discovered that Instagram has reels, which are short form videos. I hadn’t given up Instagram, because until then, all I was seeing were mostly pictures of classically designed houses and all I was posting were pictures of my family on my closed account.

    Well, did I ever get hooked on the reels, because the algorithm figured out rapidly which subjects engaged my attention the most. These are situations about which I have been praying and which weigh on my heart and tear me up with grief. All day long I was glued to my phone, running the battery down. No peace at all. No peace to pray and no peace with the Lord because I knew I was choosing the wrong thing. But I kept on doing it.

    Not only that, but I wrestled all over again with the first choice I’d made- the choice to stop trying to openly persuade people by sharing information in various forms and instead to let the peace of Christ act as umpire in my heart so that I could pray effectively.

    I went over and over it again, back and forth. It’s so compelling to want to “raise awareness” or “speak truth to power,” or “influence.” It feels, at a certain level, ridiculous and futile instead to be still and pray. And the agony of the situation that I would want to communicate about is real. Tragedy is by nature compelling.

    And it’s not wrong to speak or to compose moving messages, necessarily. It’s not wrong in itself. I don’t think. It’s just that I can’t do that on social media and not be completely sucked in and have it take over my entire focus, so that I am hardly aware of Christ.

    In those conditions, all I am thinking about are endless questions like, “Have I shared enough?” “Will this be effective?” “What if I get a negative response to this?” “Is that absolutely correct?” And constantly looking for more material. Then, if people do engage with comments either positive or negative, goodness! Forget praying, I can hardly make dinner! My poor family might as well be living with a zombie.

    In the afternoon, we went for a drive around the countryside. I was forced to leave my phone behind. Instead of seeing the digital images, I was looking at the rich greens of fields and trees. But it has recently flooded in this area. Everywhere the flood touched, the green was entirely gone, leaving only the color of mud. In the same field, at the top of the hill, you could see the rows of glistening green corn flowing down to the foot, where it became nothing but waste and brown mud, the stalks fallen over.

    It was then that I was finally praying, wrestling all over again with my choice, wanting to leave the prayer behind. But I couldn’t, because the bottom line is, for me it would be disobedience. All other questions aside, I simply would be disobeying the Lord.

    So then, that night, I had to really pray. That was rough. That’s when I felt the weight of my failure. But the Lord is so good. He reminded me, in essence, that it’s not the healthy who have need of a physician, but the sick. That is, helping sinners learn to follow Him is what He does.

    I’ve been praying that prayer by St Simeon Metaphrastes. I have ended up pestering the Lord with it. I truly have wanted Him to make me perfect. I have wanted that for 15 years now. At the time when He came into my life, I wanted it then, and at that time, He reminded me of that verse which you quote in the article- that we must grow by stages as we behold Him. It doesn’t happen all at once. But I didn’t really believe Him. I must have had some secret hope that I might after all become flawless even if I just put in enough time.

    But the other day, when I was pestering Him in prayer about this again, the Lord reminded me of something I had recently read, which is one of Father Hopko’s 55 maxims- the 53rd one: “Endure the trial of yourself and your own faults and sins peacefully, serenely, because you know that God’s mercy is greater than your wretchedness.”

    So I have been trying to do that. I still pray St. Simeon’s prayer each night, but I am settled now that I will have to try and endure the trial of myself and my own faults, putting all my hope in God’s mercy. It is new every morning, and He will do everything He promised to do, so I must leave it at that. How grateful I am that He will do it, that He will perfect me. Thank God.

    I was thinking about this all this today. My soul is still filled with echoes of noise from Sunday. But I walked into the kitchen and happened to look up and see the icon of Christ in His humiliation. So patient, so serenely loving under trial, thinking little of the shame because of the joy set before Him and because He knows His Father loves Him always.

    And I thought with a shock, my goodness, how I love this Person! I don’t want to disobey Him. I don’t want to disappoint Him. I don’t want to make a distance between Himself and I so that I can fall asleep enough not to care about hurting Him. I want to please Him and I want to return to Him, if I am at all able, some small thing, anything that I could, in return for everything which He has given me, which is even His own life.

    So I must lay aside even the weight of my own failure and keep trying to follow Him.

  34. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Jenny,
    Your honest sharing is such a blessing. As I read along, I began to think of the algorithms of our digital day as mathematical demons. “…the algorithm figured out rapidly which subjects engaged my attention the most.”

    Fr. Hopko said, “Don’t try to convince anyone of anything.” Over the years, as I’ve written (so much!), I have held this maxim in mind. That might seem untrue inasmuch as I write about various topics a lot, and even seem to be trying to make a point! But, I cannot begin to describe how many times I’ve been saved by being ineffective. Refusing arguments, refusing the “hot topics.” It’s not really a virtue, I think. It’s more that arguments (of any sort) make me feel sick (literally). I’m very bad at argumentation, quickly saying the wrong thing and sounding stupid and angry. I lose my soul in argumentation – very quickly.

    But the algorithms are everywhere. They’re not just on the internet. They design the layout of stores. They direct the work of politicians and others.

    You “had a terrible day,” but, I think you had a great day. It was a day that pulled the mask of the algorithm demons. It brought you to your true senses. Failure is such a misery – but it is gathered into the Cross – defeating every algorithm in Christ.

  35. Jenny Avatar
    Jenny

    Father,

    Yes, I think there was something diabolical about it, inasmuch as it took the very situations that I have been praying about and used my genuine love and grief to draw me away from prayer and into only pure feeling and outward expression. That would have nullified even any small spiritual good that I might have done for the situations that I long to have healed.

    Thank God that our weaknesses and ineffectiveness can be a gift in that way- that they save us from something worse and keep us humble and close to God. Not that we should sin on purpose that grace should abound- God forbid, to second St. Paul. There is enough failure in any normal day to do the trick. Sometimes when I am tempted to think more of myself than I should, all I have to do is think of how yesterday’s bedtime went and laugh. Or cry. Either is appropriate. But grace does abound.

    I learned over the years some techniques based on failure to help me manage the dangers of my writing. I also hate conflict and what’s left of my mind these days seizes up when trying to engage intellectually, making points and whatnot. In addition, I let the first impulse to write die away and then the next one. I let any urgent feeling die away. If any task gets in the way of writing, I set the writing aside and complete the task. If after all that, I have an opening of time, a clear idea of what to begin to say, and a feeling of joy to be doing this with the Lord, then I sit down.

    Father Hopko said we can bear witness or make testimony, so long as we are not trying to convince anyone. To bear witness and make testimony is life giving. When I read what you write, they are like lights on a road some way ahead and it helps me see the next step, or where I can adjust back to the path. It helps also light up things I hadn’t been able to understand before.

    Speaking of which, I feel badly because I did not directly address the main idea of this article: that the true self is not changeable nor modern but is timeless and discovered and revealed by the laying aside of anything which is false or merely temporal.

    This is a light far down the path! But I do pray now merely that the Lord will make me exactly what He wanted me to be when He first thought of me. I had to learn to do this because otherwise, I was tripping myself up trying to overestimate my capacity. That is, I was (as usual!) wanting to be and to do more than I can and being extremely anxious about not being good enough to earn what it is I most long for. This can be genuinely tormenting. So I learned to say, “Make me exactly what You wanted me to be from the beginning and put me just exactly wherever it pleases You and if it pleases You, it will please me.” There is real peace in this, thank God.

  36. Drewster2000 Avatar
    Drewster2000

    Jenny,

    When I was reading your comments, I got a mental picture to share with you in case it’s helpful.

    You are those green, lush fields you saw on the car ride. The glistening green and yellow corn is the harvest God is growing by planting them in your fields. The flooding is caused when you draw your attention away from God and the immediate world He has put around you (family, friends, nature, etc.) and redirect it to social media and political outlets in order to “change the world”.

    As you say, it’s not wrong to speak or write, to compose moving messages or witness to the truth in our lives. But as Fr. Stephen says, the problem comes when we try to control outcomes. Not our job. As the fields, it is your job to receive all the sun and rain and air He sends your way, to show up and be faithful to the place in the countryside you have been allotted. Results are up to Him.

    I want to encourage you to continue in the good habits you have started. Be the fields. Allow the corn to grow, even though you don’t have any direct control over its progress. Allow the social arena to fall off your map and even when talking to one other person – another Fr. Stephen bit of wisdom – only answer the questions that are being asked. As St. Paul says, answer for the hope that lies within you.

  37. Jenny Avatar
    Jenny

    Drewster,

    I think so too. I myself did not make the connection as we were driving, at the time I was seeing it. But I did later, when I was thinking about writing the comment. It was sobering. I might write a comment on Father Stephen’s latest post if I have time, I’m not sure. It might take days to find the time.

    “Be the fields.” 🙂 It’s good encouragement and a snappy phrase!

  38. Michael Williams Avatar
    Michael Williams

    As one who “came from nothing” through my secular upbringing, I was defined by my culture. When I came to the church, we would always read from a little blue book during the Matins service. We would only read a little of it, but those words I had never heard before, and I wanted more.

    At first, those words I recognized were St. David’s, some ancient king. Then, those words reminded me of myself, of my own struggle throughout the world, and my sojourn on it. The mire, the struggle, the elation, the woes, the anger, the worldly-fear and the fear of God.

    Those words finally reminded me of Christ, and His struggles. But they are at once my struggle, and Christ’s struggle together, synergistically combined without confusion.

    My heart is so fickle; I am at one time with God, connecting and expressing my love for Him. At another, I am lost, separated and apart from Him. There is another time when I turn my back on Him, and I do not want to do what He commands! But I must. This is what my life was given to me for. I recognize the winds of the world, “for when the wind is passed over it, then it shall be gone, and no longer will it know the place thereof…” and “They will be changed like a garment…” and “I looked for his place and I found it not…”

    I will one day become a distant memory. I hope to be remembered with the words of the Psalter, that they are on my heart more than modernity and the popular words of this time. They are ageless and everlasting.

  39. Matthew Avatar
    Matthew

    Thank you so much for your comment Michael. It really resonates with me.

  40. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Michael,
    The words of the psalms that echo in our hearts are an abiding proof that we do not have a “modern” heart. We have a human heart.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Subscribe to blog via email

Support the work

Your generous support for Glory to God for All Things will help maintain and expand the work of Fr. Stephen. This ministry continues to grow and your help is important. Thank you for your prayers and encouragement!


Latest Comments


Read my books

Everywhere Present by Stephen Freeman

Listen to my podcast



Categories


Archives