The Last Christmas – Ever

This Christmas was the last Christmas – ever.

Christ is the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. Wherever He is, there is the beginning and the end of all things. If Christ is truly present in this year’s Christmas, then it is the last Christmas – and the first Christmas. And if statements like this make your hair hurt – then read on.

Our common way of thinking about the world is marked by the linear passage of time (it moves from past to present to future) and by cause and effect (everything is caused by something else). And we think of the two things together (a cause always happens before the effect). That being the case, we would never say that what someone is going to do tomorrow caused something to happen yesterday. I hope this seems obvious.

It is therefore not at all obvious when we hear the Divine Liturgy saying something quite contrary to this arrangement. St. John Chrysostom’s Liturgy has this passage:

It was You Who brought us from non-existence into being, and when we had fallen away You raised us up again, and did not cease to do all things until You had brought us up to heaven, and had endowed us with Your kingdom which is to come.

The clear meaning of this passage puts being “brought up to heaven” and being “endowed with the Kingdom” in the past tense (past perfect to be more precise). Indeed there is a complete jumble of tenses in the last phrase: had endowed us…Kingdom which is to come. Whaaa?

So God has given us something in the past, which hasn’t come yet. Such language is not isolated. It occurs again later in the liturgy:

Do this in remembrance of Me! Remembering this saving commandment and all those things which have come to pass for us: the Cross, the Tomb, the Resurrection on the third day, the Ascension into heaven, the Sitting at the right hand, and the Second and glorious Coming.

The Second and glorious Coming is numbered among those things that have come to pass

This is not unique to St. John. He is merely following language that is already found in the New Testament:

But God, who is rich in mercy, because of His great love with which He loved us, even when we were dead in trespasses, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved), and raised us up together, and made us sit together in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, (Eph 2:4-6)

and

He has delivered us from the power of darkness and conveyed us into the kingdom of the Son of His love, (Col 1:13)

Something that seems clearly in the future is spoken of in the past and addressed to us in the present. What is this? This is the true character of eschatology – the study of last things.

For one segment of contemporary Christians, eschatology (the study of last things) refers to questions of what will happen at the end of the world. It concerns itself with wars and political figures, the persecution of the Church and such. It places last things in the last place, thereby conforming to the normal world of cause and effect and the flow of time. But this provides no manner for understanding the strange language of St. Paul (or St. John Chrysostom) and actually misses the entire point of the last things.

The first proclamation of Christ (and of John the Baptist) is: “Repent, for the Kingdom of God is at hand.” Modern scholars, having lost a proper understanding of eschatology, often misinterpret this as an announcement of an immediate coming of the end of the world in a linear, cause-and-effect manner. They equally think that Jesus was “mistaken” in this and that his followers had to change the message to fit his failure.

And the message is misunderstood as well. For many, the “coming of the Kingdom of God” is made into an ethical event, while others simply give up on the topic and make Jesus’ ministry into something else. For example, the forensic model of the atonement reduces Jesus’ ministry to His blood payment on the Cross. His teachings, healings and wonders become of little importance (again reduced mostly to ethical teachings).

Only the strange world of traditional eschatology sees Christ’s ministry and the whole of His work as a single thing and continually present within our lives at this moment. This strange world is found within the liturgical and sacramental life of Orthodoxy – indeed, it is essential.

The Kingdom of God proclaimed by Christ was not an expectation of a soon-coming political entity. It was the announcement of an immediate presence that was Christ Himself. When St. John the Forerunner sent his disciples to question Jesus, as to whether he were the Messiah, the reply was given in the language of the Kingdom:

Jesus answered and said to them, “Go and tell John the things you have seen and heard: that the blind see, the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, the poor have the gospel preached to them. (Luk 7:22)

It is a reference to the Messianic prophecy of Isaiah:

The Spirit of the Lord GOD is upon Me, Because the LORD has anointed Me To preach good tidings to the poor; He has sent Me to heal the brokenhearted, To proclaim liberty to the captives, And the opening of the prison to those who are bound; To proclaim the acceptable year of the LORD…

Christ says what He says and does what He does, because He Himself is the coming of the Kingdom of God. And where the Kingdom is, these things happen. The Kingdom of God is a present-tense manifestation of a future-tense reality (which is actually an eternal reality that forms the future, the telos, of all creation united with God).

This is the very heart of the Divine Liturgy. There we remember something that was itself a present tense manifestation of the Messianic Banquet, rather aptly called the Last Supper. We eat a meal that was an eating of a meal that has not yet been eaten.

Such statements make for very strange reading. But listen to these words spoken quietly by the priest as he breaks Body of Christ in the altar:

Broken and divided is the Lamb of God: Who is broken, yet not divided; who is eaten, yet never consumed; but sanctifies those who partake thereof.

The liturgy is filled with such inner contradictions. It is a hallmark of the Orthodox liturgical experience.

The Christian life is an eschatological reality. The life that is ours in Christ “has not yet been revealed” (1Jn 3:2) and yet it is a present reality. This same character runs throughout all of the sacraments. We are Baptized into the death and resurrection of Christ as into present events. Holy Unction is a manifestation of the Kingdom to come in the same manner of Christ’s miracles, and so forth. This is among the reasons that Orthodoxy is described as “mystical.” It means precisely what it prays.

And this differs profoundly from those who have turned Christianity into a merely “historical” religion. For them, the historical event of Christ’s death and resurrection represents a transaction that has paid for their sins. The time after Christ’s Ascension only marks a period for evangelization and awaiting His Second Coming. Nothing in particular has been made different about the time we live in. Our time is still viewed as linear, marked by cause-and-effect, in no way differing from the time of an unbeliever. True eschatology has no place in such a scheme.

But the proper heart of the Christian life is learning to live in communion with this eschatological reality – to participate now in the life of the Kingdom which is to come. This present tense participation in an eternal reality is how we die to ourselves, how we find a new life, how we enter the Kingdom, how we find the place of the heart, how we overcome the passions, how we eat the heavenly bread, how we trample down death, how we are justified and made holy.

We are living the last things. Ever.

About Fr. Stephen Freeman

Fr. Stephen is a retired Archpriest of the Orthodox Church in America. He is also author of Everywhere Present: Christianity in a One-Storey Universe, and Face to Face: Knowing God Beyond Our Shame, as well as the Glory to God podcast series on Ancient Faith Radio.



Posted

in

, ,

by

Comments

15 responses to “The Last Christmas – Ever”

  1. david Avatar
    david

    I love Science Fiction. However, when the author and/or writers start playing with time travel, I know it will be a silly story or episode. And so your treatment of kairos is a brilliant explanation of the gospel’s climax. Thank you, Father, for such a succinct and clear message.

  2. John Mark Lamb Avatar
    John Mark Lamb

    Father Stephen, thank you for this beautiful Christmas Eve gift. You are a biblical and cultural translator for me as I continue to deconstruct my limited understanding of the Beautiful Gospel.

    I have always been taught as a Protestant that Matthew 24 and 25 referred to the end times on earth prior to the Second Coming of Christ. Do you believe in a pyhsical and bodily Second Coming of Christ to earth?

  3. Paula Wilson Avatar
    Paula Wilson

    Amen.

  4. Glennis Moriarty Avatar
    Glennis Moriarty

    Wow. Thank you! Happy Christmas!

  5. Daphne Paparis Avatar
    Daphne Paparis

    Father Stephen,

    Is it possible to write you an email with a question instead of posting here?
    Have a wonderful Christmas.

  6. Julia Janet Cleghorn Avatar
    Julia Janet Cleghorn

    Wow, Father Stephen just wow! Thank you so much. This is wonderful! Merry Christmas, and glory be to God for all things!

  7. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    John Mark,
    Orthodoxy certainly teaches a Second coming of Christ and the end of the age, as is common across most of Christianity. I would say, however, that many Western Churches have a strictly chronological, linear view of history, whereas many of the great Fathers of the Orthodox Church also have a more mystical approach (in addition to the linear), where the understanding of time is greatly expanded. Christ is the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. The Scriptures teach that the Lamb was slain “from the foundation of the earth,” etc. All of which means that though we ourselves live in a largely linear experience of time – God transcends that – and the life of the Church (which is the life of the Kingdom) transcends it as well.

    So, I wait for the Second Coming of Christ – but we also stand before the great Judgment Seat of Christ even now…etc.

  8. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Daphne,

    Yes. email hidden; JavaScript is required

  9. Bart Williamson Avatar
    Bart Williamson

    Father Bless!

    Alcuin of York is said to have objected to the use of Icons in Church.
    As one of Charlemagne’s principal theologians, it seems to me if you object to the use of Iconography, then you don’t know why Icons are present in Church in the first place.

    Perhaps that was the moment the Western Church began to lose the Vision of God-Christ’s Revelation to Man-or as you put it, revealing the Glory-the Kingdom, as it were, of God by way of the Holy Spirit.
    And if that happens, you lose the proper understanding of time as revealed by Christ and you are left with the understanding of time as our fallen humanity sees it-as simply one chronological event after another with no connection to Eternity.

    We honor the Saints depicted in the Iconography, but we worship the God whose Eternal and Divine Presence the Icon reveals. If your understanding of time is off kilter, which in a fallen world it is, then Icons make no sense to the Heterodox-and the Heretical-which is why there is so much hostility to them in the West.

    That said, Merry Christmas and a most blessed New Year Father!

  10. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Bart,
    The West never really understood the use of icons, nor of the theology surrounding their veneration in the Church (particularly in the writings of Eastern Fathers such as St. Theodore the Studite and others). It points to the sad fact that theological interchange between East and West had already dwindled to a bit of a trickle long before Alcuin. Though the West did not object to icons (or statues), the piety of their veneration was not a shared understanding.

    May God’s providence work towards the salvation of us all.

    Merry Christmas, and blessings in the New Year.

  11. Matthew Avatar
    Matthew

    It might have only been me, but even when I was a charismatic evangelical I think I was desperately attempting to experience Christ in the here and now. We talked about the “here and not yet” qualities of the Kingdom and although we subscribed to PSA, I think intuitively I personally grasped that there was more to eschatology than meets the evangelical eye.

    I suppose the main difference is that this eschatological reality is more pronounced and even more clearly explained in Orthodoxy. I don´t believe evangelicalism (as an example) thinks only historically and in a linear fashion regarding Christ´s Kingdom and his eventual return.

  12. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Matthew,
    Pentecostalism (which includes charismatics), has a definite openness to the “now-ness” of the Kingdom.

    Christ is born! Merry Christmas!

  13. terence Avatar
    terence

    A wonderful message Father, I Thankyou and Merry Christmas, I keep learning so much from you

  14. Matthew Avatar
    Matthew

    Thanks Fr. Stephen.

    Merry Christmas to you as well!

  15. Abdelnour Abdelnour Avatar
    Abdelnour Abdelnour

    Amen

    Very true

    God bless you father

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Subscribe to blog via email

Support the work

Your generous support for Glory to God for All Things will help maintain and expand the work of Fr. Stephen. This ministry continues to grow and your help is important. Thank you for your prayers and encouragement!


Latest Comments

  1. Thanks for that great advice, Fr Stephen. The Fathers and others writing before 1500 would surely be the best resources.…

  2. Dear Fr Stephen Thank you for another great article. This article is interestingly timed. In just over a week, I…

  3. This is the actual quote for those who are wondering, the one that is circulating on the internet and appears…


Read my books

Everywhere Present by Stephen Freeman

Listen to my podcast



Categories


Archives