The Nature of Being Human

“Human nature” is a term that can have a casual meaning in any number of conversations. I recently listened to a discussion with an academic professional who made the statement that “anyone who failed to understand that human nature was evil would never understand the lessons of history.” From the perspective of Orthodox theology – he had said something profoundly untrue – and, I would argue, it skewed his reading of history.

What is human nature?

Human nature has a casual meaning: “what are people basically like?” But in the language of the Church, a “nature” is something quite specific with a theological meaning. It is a phrase that is deeply important.

A “nature” is the very “essence” (ousia) of a thing. It is the answer to the question: “What is it?” In the teaching of the Church we do not describe human nature as evil, or even sinful. Indeed, our nature was created good, and it remains so. The nature of all created things is good. Surprisingly, even the demons were created with a “good” nature. Today, they may very well hate their own nature, even as they hate their own existence (and the existence of all things). We could very well say that the demons have made themselves enemies to all created natures, including their own. But that terrible choice is a rebellion – they are in rebellion against their own angelic nature.

Of course, we speak of human beings as “fallen.” However, in Orthodox teaching, this does not refer to our nature itself. Rather, it refers to the fact that we have been made subject to death – we are mortal. It is “death at work in us” that we describe as “sin.” But the origin of sin is not found in our nature. Our nature is inherently good. Understanding this makes a huge difference when we think about human relationships and the character of our common life.

If you take the view (which is common in certain corners of Western Christianity) that human beings have a “sin nature” – that we are, in fact, essentially bad – then how we view one another and the character of our common life takes on a different caste. In an Orthodox understanding, a Bible verse such as, “Spare the rod and spoil the child,” can mean little more than “children need discipline in their lives to help them”. Whereas in a world in which human nature is held to be a “sin nature,” then “sparing the rod,” would be seen as letting evil run amok. It would hold that our nature not only needs to be restrained but requires a vigorous regime of reward and punishment. It has not been that long since the notion of “beating the evil out of a child” was common.

Human Beings are by Nature Good

When we speak of our nature as “good,” we are not declaring that human beings are born as saints. Rather, we are saying that our nature (“what we are”) tends towards the good, desires the good. We desire beauty. We desire well-being. We desire truth. Even when we engage in evil actions, they are most often grounded in a misperception of the good. Dictators do not come to power by asking people to be evil – they come to power by distorting the image of the good.

Recognizing that there is an inherent drive towards the good suggests not that the world is perfect, but that we are not “swimming against the current” when we nurture children towards the good, the true, and the beautiful. By nature, it is what they desire.

The lessons of human history are revelatory of our nature. Were we inherently sinful (evil by nature), we would have long ago destroyed ourselves in a whirlpool of madness and destruction. Though it is quite true that history has seen terrible things done (wars, persecutions, etc.), it is still the case that human beings continue to push back against these terrible things. We are not born hating and killing – it is acquired, despite our nature.

Every child born pushes against the evil and yearns for the good. The innocence of each child points to the clear teaching of the Church. Christ rails in the strongest possible terms against those who cause a child to stumble – the stumbling is not the work of our nature but of a will that has turned aside from its nature. The greater understanding which we should rightly take from all of this is that our nature is for us. The universe is not stacked against us; God is for us; the goodness of all creation is for us. We are not living in a world of moral cripples.

The Social Nature of Human Beings

Human beings also have a “social” nature. We are created to live in community, though the shape and form of that reality has changed across the ages. Beyond all else, ours is a nature that is rooted in love, reflecting the nature of God, Whose image we are. When that love is made manifest in the world we see humanity at its truly greatest. When that love is distorted, misdirected, or hidden by abuse and cruelty, we see humanity at the very abyss of evil. At such moments it is hard not to despair.

Christ gave us the Church – a communion of our common human nature united with His divine nature – commanding us to love one another even as He loves us. Only in such a social setting can the fullness of our humanity be revealed.

It is in our social nature that our greatest failures are made manifest. At its worst, the collective overwhelms and subsumes the individual and the atrocities of mass behavior take over. This phenomenon is the fuel of many of the most cruel acts in history. When the individual is subsumed, “no one is responsible,” and the truth and value of personhood are suppressed. This is why the life of the Church has many of the structures that Christ, in the Holy Spirit, has given to her. Christ’s words to the Apostles are filled with cautions to “rule” only as servants, to be “washers of feet.” The entire sacramental life of the Church, with its discipline of worship, confession, repentance, communion, and service, are given as a means of living a life that is in accord with our true nature.

I think that one answer to the question, “Why are you Orthodox?” would be, “Because anything less would be insufficient.” Or, perhaps, “I need all the help I can get.”

You are created good. You are fearfully and wonderfully made. You are loved.

Give thanks for all things.

About Fr. Stephen Freeman

Fr. Stephen is a retired Archpriest of the Orthodox Church in America. He is also author of Everywhere Present: Christianity in a One-Storey Universe, and Face to Face: Knowing God Beyond Our Shame, as well as the Glory to God podcast series on Ancient Faith Radio.



Posted

in

,

by

Comments

6 responses to “The Nature of Being Human”

  1. Christine Carson Avatar

    This!! Thank you! I have been on a mission to share this truth with so many who have had a skewed view of what it means to be human-taught incorrectly-and to direct people to the truth of what Gods word says! We are created in HIS image. I love everything about this post today. Thank you!!

    For His Kingdom,
    Christine

  2. Mike N Avatar
    Mike N

    Father Stephen:

    Some good thoughts here. Difficult to get my head around. As I get older I want to finish well, I am 74 at present. I was raised Lutheran and as the church I grew up up in began to be overwhelmingly influenced by culture and no longer trusted scripture or “tradition” we left and spent over 30 years in evangelical churchs and sometimes charismatic.

    The concept of original sin was taught and is hard to see beyond. Over and over I was told that, “ the heart is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked: who can know it?” Jeremiah 17:9.

    I believe that how we see our God and father is very important if we are to love him with all my heart soul and strength. I suppose I have Augustine to blame. It appears that the Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church’s (followed but the Reformers) took very different paths in understanding who we are as humans. And as time goes on it gets more confusing. Is there an age of accountability? Is it “Grace alone” or what is my responsibility.

    You gave me some things to think about. I greatly enjoy your blogs and what you reveal about Orthodox Christianity. I attended a couple Sunday worships when I lived in Washington but ethnicity seems to play a role in belonging. Is there fellowship between the various orthodox churches? Between the Antiochian and Orthodox Church in America for example.

    Thanks for your message

    Mike N

  3. Dee of Sts Herman and Olga Avatar
    Dee of Sts Herman and Olga

    Father,
    The relationship of meaning in the words ruler-servant, as far as I know is unique to Christianity in western societies. However in some of the Indigenous communities that I serve, these values are still actively taught by the elder generations. And the elders have a place in the service to the community.

    On the scientific side there has been two perspectives of characterising human nature: survival of the fittest, on the individual level, and the survival of the group requiring sacrifices and guidance within the group to maintain the survival of the group.

    And then there is the is the Life in Christ— and the fullness of being. It takes courage and faith to put on Christ.

  4. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Mike,
    First, there is indeed communion and cooperation between the various jurisdictions of Orthodoxy (a legacy of the history of their coming to America, etc.). In places where there is a strong ethnic presence (numerically) you might feel a bit like a stranger (just as a German might feel in an Anglican Church). But, increasingly, this is changing. Somewhere over 75-80 percent of clergy in the OCA are converts, and, I suspect that the majority of Antiochian clergy in the US are as well. Even in the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese, over 25 percent of their priests are converts. This reflects how the “ethnic” makeup of Orthodoxy within America has slowly (and more quickly these days) become not ethnically defined.

    As to original sin. Orthodoxy, interestingly, does not have that idea. Some speak of “ancestral sin” – meaning that we inherit a broken world (but no personal guilt) from the past. But, in Orthodoxy, it is death rather than guilt that marks the nature of sin.

    Orthodoxy is perfectly comfortable saying, “We are saved by grace.” But what we mean by it is quite different. We do not think of salvation as juridical – that God has (by grace) changed our legal status from damned to saved. We do not think in juridical terms (when we are thinking properly). Rather, grace itself we understand to be nothing other than the very life of God, or the “divine energies,” to use a theological phrase common in Orthodoxy.

    This is to say – since “salvation” means to be changed into the image of Christ, to become a partake of the very life of God, or, stated quite boldly, to “become by grace everything that God is by nature” (that’s the teaching of the Fathers). We obviously can’t do this for ourselves. St. Gregory of Nyssa once said that “man is mud (or dust) who has been commanded to become a god”. We can’t do it ourselves.

    The “fall” interrupts that original plan for human beings (which would have still been a salvation by grace) and Christ, in His death and resurrection, and through our restored communion with Him in Baptism and Holy Communion, restores that plan and path and we continue, by grace (the very life of God), to grow “from glory to glory” being transformed into the very image of Christ.

    I’ve heard that Luther once described the Christian as a “snow covered dung hill.” Orthodoxy, would rather describe us as a “snow covered snow hill.”

    Now, none of that is meant to make light of sin and the depths of depravity that human beings are capable of – but these depths are contrary to our nature – they are an offense to our nature. If our nature were depraved, there would never be any recovery, no innocent children. The doctrine of original sin, at its worst, has left a terrible legacy – mostly because it’s just not true. It doesn’t describe what is.

    There is indeed an “age of discretion” – an age at which children begin to become adolescents and to take increasing independence and responsibility on themselves. In Orthodoxy, we begin communing a person from the moment of Baptism (so, as infants, usually). But, we do not start hearing their confessions until around age 8 or so – when that adolescence begins to be manifest. It should, at best, be a very gentle process – and not a time for scaring children about sin, etc.

    As to Jeremiah 17:9 – it’s certainly true that the heart can be deceitful and desperately wicked – but that verse need not be taken to say that it started that way, and is that way even in a child, or that the heart is only deceitful and desperately wicked. That would negate everything else that is said positively about the heart. Here’s a great quote from the desert tradition of Orthodoxy – from the Macarian Homilies:

    “The heart itself is only a small vessel, yet dragons are there, and lions, there are poisonous beasts, and all the treasures of evil, there are rough and uneven roads, there are precipices; but there too is God and the angels, life is there, and the Kingdom, there too is light, and there the apostles and heavenly cities, and treasures of grace. All things lie within that little space.”

    Protestantism has a bad habit of forcing the Scriptures to say more (or less) than they do, and then to claim that they’re just “quoting the Scripture.” Nonsense. It was always a theological revolution that meant to overturn the Catholic faith…and its legacy has been a constant overturning (even of itself) ever since.

  5. Christian Hollums Avatar
    Christian Hollums

    “The true mark of human nature is the continual stretching forth toward what lies beyond.”

    St Gregory of Nyssa

    Would you agree with this statement below in quotes?

    “Human nature = an unfinished project fulfilled in Christ’s Cross; humanity is revealed, not presumed.”

    I’m going to use the dirty word progress here, but it seems St Gregory of Nyssa defines our nature as infinite progress (epektasis).

    What I think for Gregory to be human is to participate without limit in the divine life—a becoming rather than a static essence. Evil and sin, for Gregory, it seems, are not substances corrupting nature but privations that interrupt this movement of ascent. A distorted vision if you will.

    How does this statement land for you?

    Our problem is not that our nature became evil but that our freedom and vision have turned away from the telos in which that nature finds its completion. The “fall” is not the loss of our humanity but our forgetting of what being human means.

  6. Matthew Avatar
    Matthew

    This article is proclaiming such good news. Thanks Fr. Stephen.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Subscribe to blog via email

Support the work

Your generous support for Glory to God for All Things will help maintain and expand the work of Fr. Stephen. This ministry continues to grow and your help is important. Thank you for your prayers and encouragement!


Latest Comments

  1. “The true mark of human nature is the continual stretching forth toward what lies beyond.” St Gregory of Nyssa Would…

  2. Mike, First, there is indeed communion and cooperation between the various jurisdictions of Orthodoxy (a legacy of the history of…

  3. Father, The relationship of meaning in the words ruler-servant, as far as I know is unique to Christianity in western…


Read my books

Everywhere Present by Stephen Freeman

Listen to my podcast



Categories


Archives