Friday – the Day of the Cross

crucifixionicon.jpg

From an earlier post on the Cross.

In writing about our union with Christ I offered the following as the response to a question. It seemed to me, worth a posting of its own, though it be short. I have, however, added a few thoughts to it.

There are many ways of which to speak of Christ’s work on the Cross, all of them, of course, seeing it as central. In some ways, it is the whole of the Old Testament in a single moment. Which image of sacrifice is not fulfilled in that Great Sacrifice, and yet there are many images? Christ is also the Paschal Lamb, which itself is not part of the normal sacrificial system and yet it is in the Cross as well.

Nor does the sacrificial system make much sense except by some aspect of union with that which is offered. But on the Cross, Christ completes His union with us, if I may be so bold, by assuming even our death that by death He might trample down death.

The mistake too easily made is to think of the Cross as only one thing. The Cross is everything. All things are summed up and completed by Christ on the Cross, just so, everything is summed up and healed in His resurrection from the Dead. On the Cross He is the serpent lifted in the wilderness. On the Cross He is the Lamb of the Passover. On the Cross He is the Offering of Atonement. On the Cross He is Moses’ staff stretched over the waters of the Red Sea. On the Cross He is the arms of Moses stretched out at the destruction of Amalek. On the Cross He is the ram in the thicket that God gave in place of Isaac. On the Cross He is Blood poured out on the Mercy Seat. On the Cross He is the love of God made manifest in its utter self-emptying. On the Cross He is the Bridegroom now come for His bride to bring her back from the dead. On the Cross He is man in His alienation from God and God in His union with man.

All of these are part of the fullness of what it means to be forgiven, and I have only barely touched the edge of it. God has reconciled us to Himself through the Cross of Christ. This is not to say one thing – it is to say everything.

We’ll have read my writings wrong if it is seen that I have offered “the” explanation of the Cross. The Cross is the explanation of everything else, while no one other thing can explain the Cross.

About Fr. Stephen Freeman

Fr. Stephen is a priest of the Orthodox Church in America, Pastor Emeritus of St. Anne Orthodox Church in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. He is also author of Everywhere Present and the Glory to God podcast series.



Posted

in

, ,

by

Comments

7 responses to “Friday – the Day of the Cross”

  1. Alice C. Linsley Avatar
    Alice C. Linsley

    Anthropologically speaking, the practice of sacrifice is very old. It likely began when the earliest humans experienced blood guilt (which is of two kinds: blood shed in killing and blood shed in birthing). Those holy ones who offered sacrifice were proto-priests. The Cross represents the sacrifice, but it is by His blood that all things are accomplished. Recognizing this, the Apostle Paul speaks in his writings of the Blood of Christ no less than 12 times.

  2. Irene Avatar
    Irene

    Father, bless! I am a convert (very recent) to Orthodoxy, and this question probably arises as a result of too many years spend in ‘washed-in-the-blood’ baptist churches … but what you describe sounds synonymous with the protestant notion of penal substitution. I am probably equivocating on certain terms that still have a distinct ring from my upbringing. can you (when your leisure permits) explain how it is different, or how I am misunderstanding it? thanks ever so much.

  3. tyrporter Avatar
    tyrporter

    Is it likely that Paul was speaking Anthropologically or knew the historical roots and meanings of blood sacrifice outside of his present day Jewish and Roman pagan paradigms?

  4. fatherstephen Avatar

    tyrporter,

    St. Paul doubtless wrote with limitations, which does not change Alice’s point, I think.

    Irene,

    I am not particularly speaking of the Protestant penal substitution which would be only one way of speaking of the Cross. Instead I am speaking more of St. Athanasius’ “Divine Solidarity” or our union with Christ, and His union with us. It is not so much substitute one for another as it is uniting us to Him and Him to us. There is, it seems to me, a difference. Though all of it is to speak of our salvation in Christ.

  5. LynneA Avatar
    LynneA

    Scott Cairns’ poetic rendering of St Ephraim of Syria, “Due Praise”:

    “…Glory to the One who sank to save the sinking sinner.”

    in Love’s Immensity, Mystics on the Endless Life. Brewster MA: Paraclete Press, 2007.

    (How does one do italics in this blog?)

  6. fatherstephen Avatar

    I can edit them in but otherwise I’m not sure.

  7. stamati Avatar
    stamati

    thank you for writing this, it was a blessing to me!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Subscribe to blog via email

Support the work

Your generous support for Glory to God for All Things will help maintain and expand the work of Fr. Stephen. This ministry continues to grow and your help is important. Thank you for your prayers and encouragement!


Latest Comments

  1. I listened to Bishop Alexander’s 2016 OCAMPR talk, Father, because I learned of him from you. It was really wonderful.…

  2. I was aware of something during Liturgy this past Sunday. I was struggling with focus–constantly distracted by one thought or…

  3. Regarding shame, I’d like to add to the above, that in our “outcome-minded” mindset, I will often see such difficulties…

  4. Just another note on “worthy.” Today I was reading in Matthew 10, which finishes with these striking verses (striking esp.…

  5. “Repent for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!’. The sins of others that I see often remain unacknowledged and…


Read my books

Everywhere Present by Stephen Freeman

Listen to my podcast



Categories


Archives