The End of the Modern World

“Welcome to the 21st Century!”

Pick your issue, and if its outcome conforms to a popular, desired norm you are likely to hear such a greeting. The greeting also implies that a less than desirable outcome is wrong because it doesn’t belong to our time. It might be characterized as “medieval,” “outmoded,” “out-of-date,” “primitive,” “Neanderthal,” “reactionary,” etc. None of which actually describe anything. Such labels are value judgments and rhetorical devices that dismiss undesirable actions as beneath consideration. We are “modern” people.

 The notion of “modern” is also deeply linked with the myth of progress. The story thus runs that modernity is the natural, even inevitable outcome of history. That which does not fit within the desired modern model is simply outmoded, not yet developed. It is something that will change, inevitably.

 A recent article by Giles Fraser in The Guardian looks at this rhetorical device. Its title says a lot: “Our Secular Salvation Myth Distances Us from Reality.” Indeed. The “Secular Salvation Myth” of Modernity is not just about our time of the world, a time when technology exists at a certain level. The myth says that we live at a point in history that was always the point – everything has always been tending towards this very present time and arrangement.

 Fraser’s article draws attention to a clever trick. Anything in the present time that does not fit the desired model is treated as though it were not actually in the present time.

 Rather than … questioning the arrogance that has led us to believe that we are the inheritors of a historical tradition of success and process, society has developed a neat trick: it simply denies that shocking events are part of our time.

 A massacre in some corner of the world shocks our sensibility. But it is described as “Medieval,” as if the modern world were somehow immune from atrocities. It is worth noting, that the labels attached to various periods of history, “Classical, Dark Ages, Medieval, Modern, etc.,” were all invented in the so-called Modern period. They were invented to support the notion of an evolutionary progress and inevitability in history.

 I have written previously about this myth of progress. Things are not progressing. They change, but they do not progress. History is not going anywhere. Some changes bring benefits, many changes bring misery. The myth of progress is a narrative that justifies the destruction of traditional ways of life (or anything else that is seen as standing in its way). It frequently takes no account of the collateral damage left behind in its march. Progressive-driven accounts of history carefully ignore the carnage and dislocations brought about by change. Progress is the narrative told by those who receive the profits.

 Modernity is a rhetorical device. The modern world does not produce wonders or even Apple Phones. Those are the work of technology, something with roots in the ancient world (cf. the Antikythera Mechanism). Modernity is simply the place where the myth was invented – not technology.

Believers will occasionally be told that their traditional beliefs do not belong in the modern world. Church practices or moral teachings that do not conform to the current ruling ideology are cataloged as belonging to some deluded, patriarchal past (or some other pejorative era). Progress demands that the Church get with the times.

 A very common canard that is trotted forth in these rhetorical assaults is the myth of progressive liberation. It tells us that the Church and society approved slavery and were wrong. The Church and society oppressed women and were wrong. The Church and society oppressed sexual choice and were wrong (etc.). Of course the strongest case in this tale of progress is that of racial slavery. But slavery based on racial inferiority is itself a modern invention. The practice of slavery referenced in the New Testament had nothing to do with racism. It had everything to do with war and the spoils of war. Prisoners of war became slaves in ancient Rome. They could and did find their freedom. It was not a caste system, nor was it ever endorsed by the Church. It was part of the economic system in which the Church was born. A large portion of the early Church were, in fact, slaves.

But it was in the modern world (in the West) that racist slavery had its birth. Slavery had existed in Africa and was quite common there. Its adoption by Western European (and American) powers was tolerated and later endorsed by false Protestant theologies and progressive ideologies. It was never a part of the ancient order.

Racist theories were grounded in notions of “modern superiority,” and of the “white man’s burden of civilization,” or worse still, notions that would later provide a haven to evolutionary racism and modern eugenics. The true problems of modern slavery were barely addressed by the Emancipation Proclamation and subsequent legislation. Its racist basis is not only thoroughly modern, but still alive in the modern breast. All of which is falsely dismissed as something that modernity has swept into the dustbin of history. Modernity is not our savior.

The current culture of abortion enjoys modern popularity and is treated as though it were a product of progressive medicine. Like many other modern schemes, a false myth of progress is employed to justify the unthinkable. Women are encouraged to destroy their children with no compunction and are told that they are in the vanguard of their liberation. Those who oppose them are seen as resisting the inevitable. The abortion culture is considered part of the progressive march of women’s rights.

This pattern is repeated for every practice deemed desirable in the modern setting. Of course, the question must be asked: Who gets to declare which practice is now the march of progress?

Another recent article raised a serious question about modernity: Can a person in the modern world believe in an ancient religion? Are there things about Christianity that are simply impossible for modern people to believe?

Charles Taylor, the Canadian Catholic philosopher, has spent a career mapping the rise of modernity and secularism. He has traced the changes in human consciousness that have accompanied its ascendancy. But a recent article takes him to task for granting modernity more power than it is due – for he suggests that modernity is here to stay and has forever changed the nature of how we think. He does not despair of Christian believing, but suggests that it must change itself and adapt to a new way of seeing the world – to incorporate the inherent doubt of modernity into its faith. Matthew Rose, writing in First Things, suggests this is nothing less than a betrayal of the faith. I would agree.

Modernity presents perhaps the greatest challenge the Church has ever faced. As mythologies go, it has a narrative that enjoys an almost unquestioned position. Its magic is invoked commonly by people everywhere. Political and social elites use it to tailor the world to their own ideologies. But a modern Christianity makes no more sense than a Buddhist Christianity, or an Atheist Christianity – for modernity is itself a religious point of view, with itself as the central point of worship.

But how do Christians live an authentic existence within the modern world? Is such a thing possible?

It is a testament to the power of modernity that such questions even seem plausible. There is nothing about our lives (technology included) that require a “modern” point of view. It is only a cultural habit and an “unexamined” life that give modernity its power.

There are several key strategies that are important for a contemporary Christian:

  1. Pay attention to the present. “Modernity” is a theory of history and the future. We do not live theoretical lives – we live in the present. The present constantly offers itself to us. It is our inattention that removes us from this reality. The Fathers speak of “watchfulness.” In our present struggle against a false myth, our watchfulness to what is truly around us is an indispensable way of life.
  2. Take your place. The myth of progress constantly diverts our attention away from the task at hand. We are always looking for the next job, the next opportunity, the next bargain, the next fashion. Following the strategy of watchfulness, we commit ourselves to the life that is given to us. The Fathers say to the monk, “Stay in your cell and your cell will teach you everything.” Modernity constantly seeks to disrupt the stability of our lives and cultures. Staying put is a Christian life-strategy. Take your place in the world.
  3. Make real choices. Although the modern myth tells us that choice is an essential part of our modern lives, we rarely make real choices. Instead, we live by our desires (which are passions and not products of the will). We spend our days living “unintentionally.” We get up, go to work, come home, etc., never actually exercising our will. We live passively and are carried along by circumstance and desire. You can only live in the present by wanting to be there. Choose to do what you do – and do it repeatedly throughout the day.
  4. Become a modern agnostic. What I mean by this is to refuse to agree to the modern myth. Are things progressing? We don’t know. Do not agree that you know what you don’t. Ignorance is just honesty most of the time.
  5. Refuse the lie. Either deeply increase your awareness of modern propaganda, or diminish your exposure (and your family’s). Become deeply aware of the constant barrage of propaganda that assaults us, selling the modern myth. Advertising, news stories, false documentaries, etc. Ignore them. Do not make them part of your mental diet or feed them to your children.
  6. Give thanks for all things. Nothing grounds us in the present as firmly and securely as giving thanks to God for all things at all times.

These, of course, are simple strategies for daily living (among many). We do well to remember that modernity is mostly powerful and important in its own mind. We are not attempting to reject some piece of hard-bitten reality – it is a myth – a false set of beliefs. We do not live in a period of time. We do not live at a climax of history. Our world is not the result of progress. Rejecting the myth of the modern world is, to a large extent, simply coming to our senses.

About Fr. Stephen Freeman

Fr. Stephen is a retired Archpriest of the Orthodox Church in America, Pastor Emeritus of St. Anne Orthodox Church in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. He is also author of Everywhere Present: Christianity in a One-Storey Universe, and Face to Face: Knowing God Beyond Our Shame, as well as the Glory to God podcast series on Ancient Faith Radio.



Posted

in

by

Comments

19 responses to “The End of the Modern World”

  1. Dee of St Herman Avatar
    Dee of St Herman

    Wow dear Father,
    Just a couple weeks back, in a conversation with fellow faculty I was accused in nuanced ‘academic speak’ of holding an ‘antiquated’ view. The topic of conversation was how the human brain learns chemistry. My outlook does not favor virtual learning of chemistry, even more so in the lab. My fellow elocutor was a psychologist making an argument on research they had read. However, they were not mindful nor cared about my own direct hand’s-on research nor long experience with teaching novices. As an academic in the field of psychology, it seemed quite apparent (to them) that their knowledge of how the mind works was superior.

    I didn’t really take a lot of time to argue (the conversation was in writing), prefering not to maintain contentiousness. But it did surprise me that the person had not deliberated non-verbal behavioral cues, nor what an ‘in-body’ experience gives a person conducting work in a lab environment such as a chemistry lab.

    I thought about suggesting some reading for them. It wasn’t research but a book written by a man who had witnessed the seemingly non-rational knowledge that is acquired in the lab. In-body experience that we in the Western world haven’t developed to explain how we learn chemistry. In lieu of it, psychologist-minded researchers developed a rubric (artificially driven by a rational structure) aligning the novice learner as a “concrete” learner, needing hand-held models and such. Then they put their theory and rubric to the test, and discovered that ‘seasoned’ or in their words ‘expert’ learners were “concrete learners” too.

    The last bit in the exchange with my fellow academic was the nuanced insinuation that my perspective was about 20 year behind the times. This is what Giles Fraser mentioned in his article a stance that Johanna Fabian calls ” “a denial of coevalness” – a denial that we share the same temporal space with those who have different values or different political aspirations.”

    Described as a [modernist] stance this (your) article has been so helpful for me to grasp what is going on in such conversations. Everything about me (being an older woman) must seem so antiquated. There is a lot of irony in such a perception, given much of my work involves the very current remediation of chemical outfalls in our environment.

  2. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Dee,
    I think that this modernist dismissal of so many things is frequently unnoticed and thus a product of ignorance. Modernity is one of the most arrogant and ignorant positions anyone can assume. It requires no empathy. Ironically, it’s a form of intellectual colonialism. 🙂

  3. Michael Bauman Avatar
    Michael Bauman

    Well, Dee, I am surprised that you describe yourself as an “older woman”. You attitude has always been “knowing, but young”.

  4. Michael Bauman Avatar
    Michael Bauman

    Dee, one of the reasons I switched away from chem as a major long ago is the school was in a remodel and they got stalled in the chem lab so there was no hands on learning. The head of the dept. had a doctorate in quantum mechanics so he did not care that much.
    If I was going to go conceptual, history was a lot more fun.

  5. Dino Avatar
    Dino

    Father
    This is.amazingly timed for me too as it is for Dee.
    Thank you so much.
    It is even more difficult when an argument with an invested modernist ideologue is not with someone that is that arrogant! but one that has a displaced yet genuine moral care for rights of others.

  6. Salaam Yitbarek Avatar
    Salaam Yitbarek

    Good morning, Father,

    The questions I will raise now have been discussed many years ago in the comments section, but I thought I’d raise them again.

    As you write, part of the success of, let’s call it, “modernity marketing”, is our tendency to compare “modern” (ie Western) societies and countries with “backwards” (developing, third world, etc.) societies, but not only in the material and technological domains, but also in the domain of virtue and morality. A Western tourist goes to Greece or Poland or India or Egypt and finds reckless drivers, a thieving civil service, swindlers, robbers, and murderers on the street…

    But it’s not only the Western tourist. The member of the “Eastern intelligentsia” observes the superior morality of Western missionaries, NGO employees, etc. compared with his countrymen. And if he has the chance to visit the West, he is enthralled not only by the technology and material wealth, but the relative honesty of everyone (he thinks).

    It probably harder to explain to the Eastern intellectual than the Western tourist, that they are the victims of a powerful illusion created not only by several coincidental historical factors, a myopic view of history, but also a deliberate propaganda campaign, and that any reasonable intellectual examination of the theory of progress would find it wanting.

    Any thoughts, Father?

  7. Matthew Avatar
    Matthew

    My family in Germany are all educated, secular, privileged, modern elites. Most all of them do not believe in anything that isn´t right within their vision and reach, and for the very few who believe in a personal God, they have much disdain for the Church.

    My wife and I, who are both practicing Catholics with an evangelical background, are simply seen as relics from a time that has long passed; as a couple whose religious beliefs have no meaning or purpose in the modern world; a family who belong to nothing more than a man-made institution that has brought more pain than relief into the world.

    As I sail through life with them, it seems that we are all passing ships in the night. It is hard that on the big questions in life we all talk past one another most of the time. Somedays it is very hard to be a committed Christian in Western Europe, but it is my home. I need to make the best of it as I continue to walk with Christ.

  8. Salaam Yitbarek Avatar
    Salaam Yitbarek

    You are definitely right, Dino. But even in this, it is helpful to force oneself out of the current myopia and look to the past for help, even the recent past, and we will remember that it was very difficult to counter Marxism and its very moral liberation of the oppressed. And if we go back to Christ’s time, I have heard it said that the Pharisees were the most moral Jews of the time.

  9. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Salaam,
    It’s an interesting and complex topic. The “blindness” of modernity (utterly secure in its own correctness about itself and the world) translates into wholesale misunderstandings of the rest of the world. America’s largest export is the myth of modernity. NGO’s, for example, are its missionaries. We bring technology, of a sort, and, in turn, destroy cultures.

    Western cultures often present a form of “morality.” It’s dominant Protestant influence had Enlightenment and Puritan roots, both of which came to nurture “morality” as a substitute for religion. Secularism is often far more “moral” than true Christianity – because it has no transcendence. The myth and religion of “progress” are validated by their morality. Several years back I was lecturing in Seattle, Washington – an American city famous for its “woke” culture. I described it as “the most moral city in America.” The “woke” phenomenon is purely “moral” though its morality is rooted in wrong ideas. Morality doesn’t have to be true – only rigid.

    Protestant Western Europe has long despised Catholic Southern Europe (and Orthodox Eastern Europe) as lazy, immoral, etc. Of course, the bourgeoise morality of secularized Protestantism disguises and covers-up many of its own deeper immoralities. The petty corruption in the Southern and Eastern cultures pale when compared the the economic, military, and industrial sins of the West. It’s like the Pharisees who “strain at a gnat and swallow a camel.”

  10. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Dino,
    Modernity is “moral” above all else. Hence my articles against “moral Christianity.”

  11. Kyriaki Avatar
    Kyriaki

    Glory to God!
    Thank you, Father Stephen, for speaking to our present cultural reality. I will be saving this post to reread again and again!

    I learned yesterday that Paul Kingsnorth will be coming to America from his home in Ireland this month. His first lecture will be held in Birmingham, Alabama on Friday, October 18th. He will be speaking on this very topic!

    Gratefully,
    Kyriaki

  12. Janine Avatar
    Janine

    Father Stephen wrote, “The petty corruption in the Southern and Eastern cultures pale when compared the the economic, military, and industrial sins of the West. It’s like the Pharisees who “strain at a gnat and swallow a camel.”

    Wow. Amen.

  13. Janine Avatar
    Janine

    Dee, thanks for your comment. I’m just curious to know if the funding for the psychologist’s research rests on some underlying value or aim, like applying it to future lcokdowns (perhaps it’s as simple as seeking to build an online presence/platform by the university).

  14. Dino Avatar
    Dino

    Thanks Father, that was good to go back and read again.
    It’s impossible not to notice the glaring, moral superiority assurance of those who champion the inverted “new values”.

  15. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Kyriaki,
    I have been reading Kingsnorth for a while and enjoy his work. I will be attending an event in Birmingham, Alabama, in a couple of weeks where he will be the speaker – it will be my first time to meet him (or speak with him). Someone recently sent me a link to an article he did on “Orthodoxy for Beginners.” Under his recommendations for internet resources he wrote:

    Father Stephen Freeman
    For my money, Fr Stephen is one of the wisest and most penetrating contemporary Orthodox voices around. He’s also highly critical of modernity and has a dry sense of humour, which hits the spot for me. His blog and podcast should be required reading and listening.

    Needless to say, I was honored (flattered, even). I had no idea he had ever read any of my work, though I found a great deal of compatibility in his work. Very much looking forward to meeting him.

  16. Krisztian Avatar
    Krisztian

    It may seem, that the so called modernity, is not a modern notion either, just the rebranding and the return of the pagan gods and their constant revolt – aka the succession myths.

    Also it might be the case that there is progress. And what we see, is in fact a progress, but towards death, or as we Christians know it as the Fall – or more precisely the continuation of it

    What we may see is nothing more than the consequences of our sins and the complete loss of our true identity, role and nature and our connection to God and his creation, which is happening to all of us and because of us as well.

    Christ have mercy on us, sinners.

  17. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Janine, et al
    American history (political, religious, cultural) cannot be understood apart from modernity, but especially from the various “moral” movements with their roots in Puritan and Enlightenment thought. CS Lewis referred to their narrative as the “Whig theory of history.”

    America was lecturing the rest of the world from a position of moral supremacy even when slavery was still the law of the land. Britain’s attitude was, “Really?”

    True Christian teaching is not rooted in “morality” (rules and behavior). Rather, it is a true, ontological transformation. “We are mud that has been commanded to become a god,” said St. Gregory of Nyssa. No amount of moral effort can add a single element of theosis. It is something quite different. Pharisaic morality necessarily judges others in that its own hypocrisy can only be justified by thinking itself superior to others.

    The New Testament actually makes no sense to modernity’s morality – it’s why Christians who use the New Testament but have a modern mindset ignore so much of what is written – only cherry-picking those things that can be twisted to support modernity’s puritanism.

  18. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Dino,
    They are truly frightening.

  19. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Krisztian,
    “There’s nothing new under the sun,” according to the writer of Ecclesiastes. “Modernity” is useful as a term for understand the present form of this temptation.

    It is also important to remember that the world is the arena in which God is working out our salvation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Subscribe to blog via email

Support the work

Your generous support for Glory to God for All Things will help maintain and expand the work of Fr. Stephen. This ministry continues to grow and your help is important. Thank you for your prayers and encouragement!


Latest Comments

  1. Krisztian, “There’s nothing new under the sun,” according to the writer of Ecclesiastes. “Modernity” is useful as a term for…

  2. Janine, et al American history (political, religious, cultural) cannot be understood apart from modernity, but especially from the various “moral”…

  3. It may seem, that the so called modernity, is not a modern notion either, just the rebranding and the return…


Read my books

Everywhere Present by Stephen Freeman

Listen to my podcast



Categories


Archives