The Frightful Path of Judas

I recall the first time the phrase, “On the night in which He was betrayed,” struck my heart. I was attending the evening service of Maundy Thursday at an Episcopal parish when I was a student in college. There was communion, followed by the “stripping of the altar” that symbolized the arrest and scourging of Christ. But the phrase, “On the night in which He was betrayed,” haunted me throughout the rest of the night. (We joined friends that evening for a meal, but I found myself so captivated by the reality of that phrase that I was, doubtless, bad company).

It strikes me as singularly instructive that St. Paul, when handing down the oral tradition of the Eucharist, recited the words that had been given to him:

For I received from the Lord that which I also delivered to you: that the Lord Jesus on the same night in which He was betrayed took bread; and when He had given thanks, He broke it and said, “Take, eat; this is My body which is broken for you; do this in remembrance of Me.” In the same manner He also took the cup after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in My blood. This do, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me.””  (1Corinthians 11:23–25)

Scholars believe that this tradition was given to St. Paul within the first few years following the events it describes. It predates the same words in the written gospels by some decades. It tells us that the earliest Christians specifically recalled that the Lord’s Supper was instituted in the context of betrayal.

That reality carries over into present-day Eucharistic devotions. We pray:

Of Thy mystical supper accept me today as a communicant. I will not speak of Thy mysteries to Thine enemies, nor will I betray Thee with a kiss as did Judas, but like the thief will I confess Thee: “Remember me, O Lord, in Thy Kingdom.”

There is an abiding remembrance that the frightful path of Judas remains an option in our lives.

What is the nature of the temptation to betrayal? I often think that we imagine ourselves within the ranks of the disciples and fail to find anything attractive about Judas’ actions. We feel “safe.” Perhaps, like Peter, we deny Christ. But, of course, that still worked out ok for Peter.

I think it is when we expand our understanding, by way of Matthew 25, that we begin to see the temptation of Judas at work. There, Christ tells us of His radical identification (even union), with the hungry, the thirsty, the stranger, the naked, and the prisoner. I daresay, we betray Him under this guise quite frequently.

In particular (as an example), I think of the naked. Nothing is more naked or vulnerable than another human being who has been seen in their shame (they abound, both among those who are near at hand, as well as many in the public sphere). Rather than covering them (as did the Sons of Noah, or Christ in His treatment of the woman taken in adultery), we often hand them over for far less than 30 pieces of silver (sometimes just to save ourselves from a bit of bother or embarrassment). The point is that we do not stand so far off from Judas.

The Church’s prayer juxtaposes Judas with the thief on the Cross. The “wise” thief, as he is called, represents a sort of minimal salvation – a prayer at the last minute of desperation (where there is only “today,” this moment). There is in that story the reminder of the radical generosity and hospitality of Christ. Naked, exposed, guilty-as-charged, we find ourselves hanging before Christ. A simple word, a single moment, and the Kingdom is ours.

We are Judas and we are the Thief. If Holy Week and Pascha teach us anything, it is to measure and view the world and ourselves in the framework of the story of Christ’s Pascha. As His death and resurrection were rushing to their fulfillment, so everything in all the world, at all times throughout the ages, was rushing to that single moment as well. In Christ, on the Cross, the entirety of creation was present. The Creator has united the creation to Himself, carrying it into His death, and re-creating it in His resurrection. We can see elements of this in creation’s reactions: the sun was hidden, the earth shook, etc.

This is to say that the truth of our own existence lies hidden in that single holy moment. If our life is “hid with Christ in God” (Col. 3:3), then it is hidden precisely in the context of His death and resurrection. Indeed, the prelude of our hidden life is, “For you are dead…and your life is hid with Christ in God.”

The highlight of the Church’s life is embedded in the events of Holy Week and Pascha. Every week is a “little Holy Week.” Every Sunday is a “little Pascha.” Indeed, in many languages, the name for Sunday is simply “Resurrection” (cf. Russian, etc.). We fast on Wednesdays and Fridays throughout the year, bringing the betrayal of Judas (Wednesday) and the Crucifixion of Christ (Friday) into every week. In those actions we allow ourselves to be gathered into that moment. What we fail to understand, I think, is that Holy Week and Pascha are being lived (or denied) within us at all times. We imagine that there is some other form of life when there was never any form other than a Paschal form.

It is through the lens of Pascha that we see the world rightly. Only in that manner do we know good from evil and everything in its purpose. St. Maximos said, “He who understands the mystery of the Cross understands all things.”

Dearest Jesus, having betrayed You and denied You repeatedly, we stand before your Cross with naked souls, hungry and thirsty for love and the grace that heals all things. Leave us not as strangers to your mercy, but in your goodness, visit us in the prisons where we languish, and remember us in Your Kingdom. Amen.

 

About Fr. Stephen Freeman

Fr. Stephen is a retired Archpriest of the Orthodox Church in America. He is also author of Everywhere Present: Christianity in a One-Storey Universe, and Face to Face: Knowing God Beyond Our Shame, as well as the Glory to God podcast series on Ancient Faith Radio.



Posted

in

, ,

by

Comments

17 responses to “The Frightful Path of Judas”

  1. Jenny Avatar
    Jenny

    Father,

    I found this Troparion for Holy Friday:

    “When the glorious disciples were enlightened at the washing of the feet, then Judas the ungodly was stricken and darkened with the love of money; and to lawless judges he delivered you, the just judge. O lover of money, look upon him who for its sake hanged himself; flee from the insatiable soul, which dared such things against the Teacher. O you who are good to all, Lord, glory to you.”

    In my religious upbringing, the motives of Judas remained largely a mystery. How could anyone do such an unspeakable thing? It was so far removed from us, that could we learn from it.

    But I see here that the Tradition remembers not only the motive, but the moment it became crystallized in Judas- at one of the Lord’s most humble acts of loving service.

    At that point, Judas chose mammon for his master. He could not serve two, so he betrayed the One, because he could not follow Christ into humble service- not washing feet, and certainly not the cross.

    When seen like this, it is not so far removed from our lives. In that case, it is far better to be the thief on the cross, and ask humbly for the grace which heals all things.

  2. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Jenny,
    Indeed. On Tuesday night (at the Bridegroom Matins), there are Troparia with the line, “Judas loves money with his mind.” It’s quite clear that he betrayed Christ for the money (and that he was a theif who had been pilfering from the money given for Christ’s work). In that sense, Judas’ betrayal is quite mundane and ordinary – a story that happens all the time.

    Even that, of course, could have been the subject of repentance and forgiveness. Money is extremely powerful. We underestimate its place in our lives – in our souls.

  3. Matthew Avatar
    Matthew

    Fr. Stephen wrote:

    “If Holy Week and Pascha teach us anything, it is to measure and view the world and ourselves in the framework of the story of Christ’s Pascha.”

    What is the story of Christ´s Pascha that I must measure myself with? That I must view the world with?

    When I say “He is risen indeed!” … what I am I really saying?

  4. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Matthew,
    I think the short answer would be to measure by Christ crucified. That I have agreed to live a cruciform life. That I honor Christ in the least of these my brethren by serving them. It keeps the Cross central rather than as an addition to something else.

    If we are to be risen with Christ, then we must also die with Him. Every day brings opportunities to lay down our lives. And, when we stumble, we get back up and stay on the path.

  5. Michelle Avatar
    Michelle

    It’s such a difficult thing to understand, how communion can be unto life or unto death, depending upon one’s preparation and the state of one’s heart.

    Holy week, the betrayal of Judas, the betrayal of the masses, can be summed up succinctly in this verse from Isaiah 1:24 (page 1059 in the Orthodox Study Bible):

    “Although you should bring fine wheat flour, it is in vain. Incense is an abomination to Me. I cannot endure your new moons, and Sabbaths, and the calling of assemblies, and fasting an holy day. Your new moons and feasts My soul hates. You have become a dissatisfaction to Me, I will turn my eyes from you. Although you make many prayers, I will not listen to you. Your hands are full of blood. Wash yourselves, make yourselves clean. Put away the evils from your souls before my eyes. Cease from your evils. Learn to do good. Seek judgment and redeem the wronged. Defend the orphan and justify the widow. Come now, and let us reason together,” says the Lord, “although your sins are like crimson, I shall make them white as snow, and although they are as scarlet, I shall make them white like wool. If you are willing and obedient, you shall eat the good things of the land. But if you are unwilling and disobedient, you shall be devoured by the sword,” for the mouth of the Lord has spoken.

    Please pray for me, an unworthy sinner
    Michelle

  6. Matthew Avatar
    Matthew

    Oh Michelle. Thanks so much for posting this.

    I wonder where Christ is in this passage from Isaiah? Fr. Stephen?

  7. Michelle Avatar
    Michelle

    Thank you, Matthew. I’m also keen to hear Fr Stephen’s thoughts.

    Forgive me if further commentary is unwanted.

    Christ is prefigured in Isaiah.

    It is somewhat easy to understand those within the Church and those without the Church — there was once circumcision, now we have baptism, etc.

    It is a very difficult thing to understand that there is a remnant within the Church for whom the Church and the entire world is preserved.

    A bit further along in the passage, Isaiah writes, “I will humble all the arrogant. … Afterward, you shall be called the city of righteousness, Zion. … For her captives shall be saved with judgment and with mercy. … Those who forsake the Lord shall come to an end. For the shall be ashamed for the idols they desired and the gardens they longed for.”

    Forgive me for not remembering the verse, but just after Palm Sunday, we read that Christ said something similar. I paraphrase from memory, ‘You did not shelter the stranger. … Though I wish to gather my chicks under the shelter of the wing of my church, you destroy those whom I send you. Those who are being saved, you create barriers for them so they are turned away.’

    These dispositions continue to be a temptation — a sort of eternal reality. We must willingly take up the cross. Our own cross — yes — but we must also willingly bear the consequences of the sins of our neighbors. In secret, for the Glory of God. That’s what Christ did.

  8. Kenneth Avatar
    Kenneth

    Fr. Stephen,

    Thank you for these helpful thoughts about Judas. This seems to be another example of an “interior reading” of Scripture (e.g., “we are both Judas and the Thief”) that you mentioned in recent comments. These reflections on Judas gave me new insights for prayer and repentance in our Vesperal Liturgy this morning and the rest of Holy Week.

  9. Jenny Avatar
    Jenny

    Father,

    What an impactful line that is, that he loved money with his mind. At the same time, it seems, the eye of his soul was darkened.

    I see now this is what St Basil means when he prays: “We entreat thine infinite goodness, enlighten the eyes of our understanding…”

    And isn’t that also what our Lord meant when He talked about the eye being a lamp, and being careful to be full of light?

    So one can be a servant of money with one’s mind, but cut off from seeing spiritual truth, or light.

    Or one can be turn ones back on money, be generous in all things, and have great hope of seeing in the light, our Lord’s light.

    In everything that I read so far- which is very little, compared to what is there, I see that the Orthodox Church has taken very seriously the Lord’s teaching on money. Also, on staying spiritually awake. In the hymns and liturgy, these themes are remembered.

    For example, I read this:

    “O Lord and Master of my life, a spirit of idleness, despondency, ambition, and idle talking give me not. Prostration

    ​But rather a spirit of chastity, humble-mindedness, patience, and love bestow upon me Thy servant. Prostration

    ​Yea, O Lord King, grant me to see my own failings and not condemn my brother; for blessed art Thou unto the ages of ages. Prostration”

    It is all so rich and so true to the Lord and His teaching.

  10. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Matthew,
    The Liturgy of the Church has a constant running inner conversation, especially in the “silent” prayers offered by the priest (they’re in the text and can usually be read) in which the interiorization of all these things is emphasized. It is Christ speaking in Isaiah – it needs to be rightly handled – but no one is in greater danger of hypocrisy than the priest. It is a powerful reminder to all of us.

  11. Matthew Avatar
    Matthew

    Thanks so much Fr. Stephen.

    I am still troubled though. We have discussed this numerous times I know. Someday maybe the penny will drop.

    One the one hand we say that Christ only wants what is best for us. He is for us, not against us. He wants to heal us. Even the fire of God´s love is there to purify us and help us, not hurt us. Pascha is the greatest news ever.

    Then there´s that passage in Isaiah …

  12. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Matthew,
    I long ago settled that Christ Crucified and Risen is God’s final word to me – to all mankind. There’s not a “then there’s that passage in Isaiah…” What I think is the case is that we too often allow our various neuroses to govern our lives and thoughts. God loves us and this is final.

    That final Word from the Cross made clear in His resurrection from the dead should be allowed to consume everything within us that somehow continues to refuse the love of God.

    I sympathize with the struggle. Recently, I had a spate of forgetfulness. “Am I loved?” I took time to read St. John’s first Epistle, from beginning to end, sitting in a quiet place, and just listened to its words. It was, if you will, an effort to stand with St. John and the Mother of God at the foot of the Cross. It was effective.

    The Scriptures can be our deepest friend – but can easily be quoted by our adversary (including our neuroses). It’s important to work towards finding that place in the heart where we can stand. We ourselves cannot atone for the sins of the world, nor even our own sins. His words from the Cross, “Father forgive them…” must become sufficient. They are spoken by the lips of the Crucified God. They are final.

  13. David Anthony Avatar
    David Anthony

    Trying to make sense of Judas, some thoughts have crossed my mind and I wonder if they have any precedence in church tradition.

    I wonder if more than mere greed motivated him. Matthew’s gospel tells of Judas going to the priests after Jesus was anointed by the woman with the costly perfume. The disciples complain of the waste, Jesus rebukes them, and then Judas departs. I wonder if he had felt personally insulted and if that hurt was instrumental in him deciding to betray Jesus.

    If so, would that also explain Judas’s unfruitful remorse? Was he concerned more about his own reputation than about the demise of Christ? Upset not so much with his actions, but how his actions made him look?

  14. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    David,
    In the Tradition, there’s not much speculation regarding Judas other than the greed portrayed in the Scriptures. It’s quite sobering. But, I think we all understand that every “bad motive” is also a “mixed motive.” Sin seems complex – layer upon layer of nothing.

  15. Michelle Avatar
    Michelle

    Matthew,

    I’m sorry if I caused you trouble.

    Fr Stephen said it best. The secret is that we are resurrected in the crucified Christ.

    If we can accept crucifixion, this will seem as regeneration.
    If we resist crucifixion, it is all burning. We shrink inward away from it and are not regenerated outward, and become isolated in a personal hell.

    God sends rain upon the just and the unjust.
    The strong words used by the prophets were to warn those who misunderstand.

  16. Janine Avatar
    Janine

    Re Mixed Motives:
    There is an interesting “undercurrent” (if that’s the right word, perhaps not), or maybe “subtext” to by which we could compare Peter and Judas.

    A Jewish friend who is a convert to Orthodoxy pointed out to me something about Peter. He said that you can see the Jewish working class in Peter and his response to Jesus’ “Get behind Me, Satan!” rebuke. How to come back from such a rebuke, so publicly made by one’s Lord, on front of all the others? And yet Peter did so. So we fast forward to the denial again so publicly predicted by Christ, and Peter’s bitter tears. And then that one moment in one Gospel, where Christ happened to glance at Peter outside in the courtyard while He was on trial. What a moment. But Peter came back.

    Judas yes no doubt was greedy etc because this is what everything tells us. Even his scathing remark to the woman one can imagine comes from a person focused on that money, and *not seeing* her love, which was praised by Christ. But he was also publicly rebuked. I have read some speculation that Judas was actually the son of Simon the Leper of Bethany (I think), and so maybe we can presume he was on home ground and came from a rather prominent family (as was the family of Lazarus of Bethany) and one located close to Jerusalem, not a Galilean like the others. Anyway, I do think there’s a case to be made about humility and the subtext of how to handle a rebuke from Christ.

    Maybe it all comes down to whether or not we can “see” love.

    Open to input from Father and anyone else on this! thanks

  17. Matthew Avatar
    Matthew

    Thanks so much Fr. Stephen. No problem Michelle.

    I am still dealing with LOTS of toxicity from my personal as well theological past. Therapy has helped. The ancient Church has helped. The sacraments have helped.

    I think there is much to be said about neurosis driving how we interpret Holy Scripture; how we view God; how we view ourselves.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Subscribe to blog via email

Support the work

Your generous support for Glory to God for All Things will help maintain and expand the work of Fr. Stephen. This ministry continues to grow and your help is important. Thank you for your prayers and encouragement!


Latest Comments

  1. Jenny, Just wondering what are your readings from? I’m not orthodox, but enjoy learning. It’s seems much more richer than…


Read my books

Everywhere Present by Stephen Freeman

Listen to my podcast



Categories


Archives