The Hidden Gospel

There is a genre of Scriptural writings that are described as “apocalyptic.” The book of Revelation, in Greek, is called “The Apocalypse.” Ezekiel and Daniel also have very strong passages described as apocalyptic. The term is very straightforward: it means “revealing what is hidden.” These books are described as “making known hidden things” because their message is disguised under rather outlandish descriptions: beasts with ten horns, heavenly cities, and buildings that come down to earth, plagues and angels and solemn warnings. Over the centuries, these books have been the playground for those who claim to understand their “secrets.” Indeed, speculation in apocalyptic literature is a booming industry in contemporary Christianity. But these books are only “apocalyptic” in the most extreme way. It is correct to say that the Christian faith is inherently apocalyptic and that all that went before it was hidden. Understanding this will help make sense, in particular, of how the New Testament treats the Old.

Consider these statements by St. Paul:

But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory: Which none of the princes of this world knew: for had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory. But as it is written, “Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.” But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. (1Co 2:7-10)

And

To me, who am less than the least of all the saints, this grace was given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ, and to make all see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the ages has been hidden in God who created all things through Jesus Christ; to the intent that now the manifold wisdom of God might be made known by the church to the principalities and powers in the heavenly places, according to the eternal purpose which He accomplished in Christ Jesus our Lord, (Eph 3:8-11)

St. Paul characterizes the gospel of Christ as something that has been “hidden from ages and from generations” but is now being made known. He also notes both that the gospel has been purposely hidden from the “rulers of this world” (meaning the demonic rulers of the age) but is now, expressly being made known by the Church “to the principalities and powers in the heavenly places.” He is not saying that the gospel is hard to understand, but that has been hidden on purpose by God. How has the gospel been hidden?

Generally speaking, the reality of the gospel was hidden beneath the life of Israel and beneath the figures of Scripture. The rulers of Israel, in Jesus’ day, had an expectation of a Messiah. However, they very much expected a Messiah whose coming was of a piece with Israel’s history and direct march through time. As such, they expected a warrior king who would deliver the nation from the Gentiles and set up a kingdom of righteousness in this world. They had no expectation of a hidden Messiah, nor did they expect a Crucified and Risen Messiah. Christ’s own disciples seem to have shared Israel’s expectation until they were corrected by Christ Himself after the resurrection.

These are clear facts, without contradiction.

The prophetic witness to Christ in the Old Testament is characterized primarily by its hiddenness. Christians have become so familiar with the traditional interpretation of certain prophetic passages that they have become unable to hear how they sound(ed) to Jewish ears. The famous Servant Songs of Isaiah (42:1-4; 49:1-6; 50:4-9; 53): we hear in them, prophecies of the very details of Christ’s suffering and death on the Cross and the promise of His victory. But we must remember that we see these things in hindsight. To this day, these passages are interpreted in Judaism as referring to the Jewish people as a whole. They were not verses of unfulfilled Messianic hope that hung over the consciousness of Israel as it longed for its deliverance.

Christ Himself spoke in parables and was berated for it. Moreover, He specifically characterized the Kingdom of God as hidden.

Another parable He spoke to them: “The kingdom of heaven is like leaven, which a woman took and hid in three measures of meal till it was all leavened. (Mat 13:33)

Again, the kingdom of heaven is like treasure hidden in a field, which a man found and hid; and for joy over it he goes and sells all that he has and buys that field. (Mat 13:44 NKJ)

Again, the kingdom of heaven is like a merchant seeking beautiful pearls, who, when he had found one pearl of great price, went and sold all that he had and bought it. (Mat 13:44-46 NKJ)

This hidden aspect of God’s work (the mystery from before the ages) is enshrined in parables, allegories, types, shadows, figures, etc. St. Ambrose, writing in the 5th century said: “The Old Testament is shadow; the New is icon, while the ‘heavenly things’ [the age to come] is the truth.’ (Off. 1.238) St. Maximus later repeated this description. The New Testament is not the historical unfolding of the historical Old Testament. It is the revelation in this world of that which was hidden in the Old Testament, but now made known through the Church to the principalities and powers in the heavenly places.

This approach to the Scriptures came to be dismissed and even despised in more modern times. One strain of thought that clearly fueled this attitude was the rise of Nominalism in the West. Nominalism rejects “inner meanings,” certainly as anything more than ideas in our heads. Things are simply things, and words nothing more than the names we call them. Straightforward moral examples and historical events, interpreted largely in their own historical context, became the preferred way of seeing the Scriptures. Prophetic statements began to be seen as flatly predictive rather than possessed of irony, allegory and paradox. Historical-critical studies that dismantled various historical claims of other Christians, would be unthinkable without the assumptions of Nominalism. The battles between conservative historicists and liberal historical critics, however, take place on a battleground foreign to the world of the Fathers.

The New Testament’s treatment of the Old, and the proclamation of a “hidden” gospel, proclaims as well that reality itself has a “hidden” quality. Only if the truth can be made known in shadow and icon is the world, in fact, as the Orthodox Christian faith says it is. This is also the character of a truly sacramental worldview. Catechesis in the Orthodox Church, as well as the continuing education of its people, should be grounded in the worldview of the Fathers. If the gospel is hidden, then we must know how to find it. This is the path that leads to the Kingdom of God.

It is also the case, I think, that the Kingdom of God is “hidden” within our own lives. We frequently make the mistake of see ourselves only in an outward sense – ignoring the mystery of our lives. When St. John says that “it does not yet appear what we shall be” (1 Jn. 3:2) he is directing our attention beyond or beneath the obvious. The pattern of sacraments (outward things whose inner reality is the Kingdom of God) is also the pattern of our own lives. St. Pauls declares, “Christ within us, the hope of glory.” (Col. 1:27) The Kingdom of God, the mystery hidden from all the ages, is presently being made known to the “principalities and powers. You and I are being observed. May God give us grace that all might see our good works and glorify our Father in heaven – and may the principalities and powers see and tremble.

About Fr. Stephen Freeman

Fr. Stephen is a retired Archpriest of the Orthodox Church in America. He is also author of Everywhere Present: Christianity in a One-Storey Universe, and Face to Face: Knowing God Beyond Our Shame, as well as the Glory to God podcast series on Ancient Faith Radio.



Posted

in

, , ,

by

Comments

39 responses to “The Hidden Gospel”

  1. Simon Avatar
    Simon

    I needed this.

  2. Matthew Avatar
    Matthew

    Thanks once again, Fr. Stephen, for such an good and informative article.

    Fr. Stephen wrote:

    “The battles between conservative historicists and liberal historical critics, however, take place on a battleground foreign to the world of the Fathers.”

    I can so see this now! Classical Christianity knows nothing of what I call the knee jerk reactions (both right and left, both fundy and liberal) of Enlightenment thinking and reasoning.

    Also … I think on the road to Emmaus when Jesus opened up the heart of the Old Testament to them to show them Himself, Jesus was teaching us all how we are to deal with the Old Testament. Not as a science book or a history book or even a book of prophetic fulfillment, but as a sacred place where Jesus was hidden and now with resurrection eyes we can find Him there.

    Finally … I pray that God gives us enough grace to find that Kingdom which is hidden, but which also wants to be revealed!

  3. Peggy Avatar
    Peggy

    May God continue to be the sourse of your Ministry.
    Sr.PeggyFanning, CSJ,Ph.D.

  4. Byron Avatar
    Byron

    I believe several of the Church Fathers commented that Jesus is in the Old Testament, although never mentioned by name. He is identified as certain angels and other things mentioned. Please correct me if I am wrong.

    Is there any listing of places in the OT where He is identified (not as a prophecy, but as active in the events and stories)?

  5. Andrew Avatar
    Andrew

    “It is also the case, I think, that the Kingdom of God is “hidden” within our own lives. We frequently make the mistake of seeing ourselves only in an outward sense – ignoring the mystery of our lives.”

    I’ve often been tormented by questions along the lines of, “Am I making progress?
    “, “Am I growing/being truly changed?” as it often seems so opaque to me. I posed this question to a priest whom I greatly appreciate and he replied:

    “We cannot tell that we have made progress, we cannot measure it, we cannot place ourselves on a diagram. We can only tell that we are trying to begin. And these are the tryings of this one location which is the substance of the entire road: we look to Christ. We switch from a self-oriented existence to a life which looks to Christ. That is all. This is a change of mind, a relocation of our heart, an abandonment of our life, a replacement of our hope away from systems, calculations, opinions, interests, and concerns, into Christ himself, who is the end of all such things. If you do not have peace, you have not begun… And please keep in mind—and this is the good news: the substance of everything is Christ, including of our struggles. He does all things, so we need not worry about our efforts, we only need to orient ourselves well. Peace, peace, peace.”

    Is this what you’re getting at in the above quote Father?

  6. Janine Avatar
    Janine

    Thank you for this much-needed article Father. When we forget that the world and are lives are sacrament (right now even) I think we lose our way. For me, I’d say we lose perhaps the joy of our faith.

  7. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Andrew,
    Absolutely! He put it very well. I think it’s an understanding that can help us understand that even our failures can be matters of grace. St. Paul found that out when his “messenger of Satan” wasn’t just removed. Its present forced him into a new way of being.

  8. Matthew Avatar
    Matthew

    Hello Byron.

    The story of Joseph in Genesis?

  9. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Byron,
    I don’t know of a list. Essentially, every “theophany” in the OT is treated as Christ. “No one has seen the Father…” If you see God…you see Christ. Iconography always goes in that direction. Other figures, though, like Joseph in Genesis, though a “type” of Christ, are not depicted as Christ. Only theophanic figures – which, interestingly, includes Christ shown in icons of the days of creation. Also, it is Christ who speaks in the OT (He is the “Logos,” the Word of God). Having said all of that, it should be understood in a truly Trinitarian sense.

  10. A Reader Avatar
    A Reader

    Byron,

    Remember than the English word angel is from the Greek word that means messenger. An angel is a messenger of God.

    Just off the top of my head, there is the angel that Jacob wrestled with all night, the one who renamed him Israel, the angel in the burning bush (Moses).
    There is Joshua the son of Nun, the companion of Moses. Joshua is the same name as Jesus. You could do a Strong’s concordance search of Joshua in Genesis through Deuteronomy and read about Joshua (as well as these other events). Joshua was one who stayed in the presence of God outside the camp in the desert.

  11. Susannah Avatar
    Susannah

    Amin! Thank you! May God;s Wisdom continue to find expression though you, Fr. Stephen, through out the Years!

  12. Jenny Weyer Avatar
    Jenny Weyer

    Amen

  13. Dee of St Herman Avatar
    Dee of St Herman

    Father,
    This lesson in your article is important and edifying, showing us the Orthodox Way, the Way of Christ.

    Before I read this article I was struck once again with the hidden Gospel, made more evident, within the Royal Hours of Theophany. These hymns teach us how to read the scriptures, as you show.

    Here is an example from the Troparion:

    “Jordan River once turned back when Elisha struck its streams * with his mantle in the wake of Elias’ ascent, * and the water was parted to the one side and to the other. * And thus the fluid stream became a dry way for him, * a symbol and truly a type of Baptism, * by which we now pass over the streaming passage of the present life. * And Christ appeared at the Jordan River * to sanctify the waters.

    In other words, what happened in the OT is a sort of preparation to see the reality of Christ’s Baptism and our own. Furthermore, the streaming water is a type of our lives streaming in the present, into which Our Savior enters. Here is more of this hidden relationship associated with the waters of Baptism. Here, I show a part of a hymn in which the river speaks of Christ’s entering within its flowing waters:

    “But now Christ, who is being baptized in me, is teaching me to burn up thorns of sins. And John bears witness with me; yes, the voice of the Logos cries out, “Behold, the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world!” To Him, O faithful, let us cry aloud, “O God, who made Your epiphany for our salvation, glory to You.”

    When the chanters spoke these words, their voices, and it seems also the voice of this River, spoke within my own heart.

    Glory to God for His Theophany! Glory to God for His hidden Gospel!

  14. Owen Kelly Avatar
    Owen Kelly

    I think it’s sometimes suffering that opens us up to the mystery of life. Maybe that’s why Christ suffered, as God, on the cross, to draw us into the inner reality of things, His own life.

    “And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself.”

  15. Owen Kelly Avatar
    Owen Kelly

    Dee,
    Those are some beautiful hymns and scriptural allusions. Thanks for posting that.

  16. Owen Kelly Avatar
    Owen Kelly

    The Cross – our cross – is the Apocalypse. It “reveals what is hidden.”

  17. Matthew Avatar
    Matthew

    Owen said:

    “I think it’s sometimes suffering that opens us up to the mystery of life. Maybe that’s why Christ suffered, as God, on the cross, to draw us into the inner reality of things, His own life.”

    Hello Owen. When we meet someone in their suffering and then stand by them in their suffering, are we meeting the crucified Christ in that space? If so, do you think this is also the case when we suffer ourselves?

  18. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    St. Maximus said, “He who understands the mystery of the Cross understands all things.” In the Orthodox calendar, we are celebrating Christ’s Baptism (Jan. 6). It is a “little crucifixion” – and is thus another Pascha. I think that everything in the Orthodox life (which would mean life in general) is Pascha (crucifixion/death/burial/resurrection).

    One of the “inner transformations” that is key to our life is the movement from meaninglessness into meaning. Suffering, if considered in-and-of-itself, is just about the most meaningless thing there can be (just like death). It is as my suffering is seen to be Christ’s suffering that this participation reveals the deeper/greater thing of my existence. It is “Christ in me, the hope of glory.”

    St. Paul was living it – “I am crucified with Christ…”

    Locally, they are threatening freezing rain this morning. My wife and I stayed home from services and read Typica. Freezing rain is more dangerous on the roads than snow. In this part of the South, we’re often “on the edge”

  19. Matthew Avatar
    Matthew

    Be safe Fr. Stephen and family.

    Why did Christ have to suffer so terribly?

  20. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Matthew,
    Not sure that I would say, “have to.” “No one takes my life from me…I lay it down of my own accord…” But, that said, “just a little suffering” would be trivial. He suffers historically (Roman Empire) the way slaves were made to suffer: crucifixion was the normal means of executing a slave. Non Roman citizens were all little more than slaves in the social calculus of Rome. A citizen could not be crucified (thus St. Paul, the citizen, was beheaded).

    So Christ came among us, poor, weak, without privilege. And that is how He suffered. I think there needed to be something like a “fullness of suffering” that He might fill all suffering – incorporate it into Himself – that He might fill it with His Life, His love, His goodness, His resurrection.

  21. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Matthew,
    Another thought on the “need” for crucifixion. It’s not the suffering of pain, per se, it’s the shameful nature of the death that is paramount. The cry, “My God, my God, why have You forsaken me?” is a cry that is about shame, not pain (as in physical pain). The Holy Week texts in Orthodoxy focus far more (almost exclusively) on the shame of the event (the mocking, the spitting, etc.) rather than the pain. I think it reveals a great deal about who we are and how we function. I thought out loud about a lot of this in my book on shame.

  22. Owen Kelly Avatar
    Owen Kelly

    Matthew,
    I think we are meeting Christ in all persons, but in those persons who suffer particularly (Matt 25).

    Perhaps the following is one way of answering your question. Suffering is a *manifest* cross to the extent we undergo it voluntarily. Christ freely suffers. In the Garden, Christ says, “Father, take this cup from me. Yet not what I will, but your will be done.” This is Christ turning our humanity away from self preservation (“take this cup”) toward free acceptance of reality the way it presents itself to us (“your will be done”). When we can encounter any hardship with the attitude, “This is my cross. This is God’s will. This is for my salvation,” I think Christ is with us manifestly.

    For those of us who cannot yet freely say, “your will be done,” Christ is present there also. Though he works in a way still hidden and unrealized. God wills their salvation too, so their suffering is included in Christ’s, hidden in his merciful heart. Once the Cross has done it’s apocalyptic work in them – even unto ages of ages – they will be revealed as well. God wills that none should perish.

    “And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw [literally: “drag”] all people to myself.”

  23. Matthew Avatar
    Matthew

    Thanks so much Fr. Stephen and Owen.

    Fr. Stephen … what was our Lord ashamed of when he cried out on the cross?

    Owen … I still struggle with suffering – my own and the suffering of others. I want to see suffering alleviated though I am aware of the role suffering plays in salvation.
    Truth be told, I have a very difficult time carrying the cross of suffering. I love Jesus Christ. I believe in Jesus Christ. I receive the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ. I do my very best to follow Jesus Christ. I believe I am being spiritually transformed by Jesus Christ. All that said, suffering is a fear I have to deal with. 🙁 I don´t deal well with suffering at all … I guess I fear God´s will being done. 🙁 Lord have mercy.

  24. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Matthew,
    “Being ashamed of something” is only one experience of something. The shame of the Cross (just a selection): being abandoned by friends; being naked and exposed; being publicly displayed as weak; mocked and laughed at; being spit on; being called names, etc.

    All of these things are real, just as the nails and the spear were real. They are emotional wounds. That’s just a few. He Himself is without sin, thus there’s nothing that he feels shame for. But He experiences shame that He does not deserve. And the experience is real.

  25. Matthew Avatar
    Matthew

    Thank you Fr. Stephen.

  26. Owen Kelly Avatar
    Owen Kelly

    Matthew,
    This quote has been a blessing to me as a text for meditation. Because I struggle with the same thing you mentioned.

    Let nothing upset you;
    Let nothing frighten you.
    Everything is changing;
    God alone is changeless.
    Patience attains the goal.
    Whoever has God lacks nothing;
    God alone fills every need.
    ~Teresa of Avila

  27. Matthew Avatar
    Matthew

    Thanks so much Owen.

  28. christa-maria Dolejsi Avatar
    christa-maria Dolejsi

    Thank you Owen, Matthew,fr. Stephen.

  29. christa-maria Dolejsi Avatar
    christa-maria Dolejsi

    Brought back again to faith,hope and love..thanks be to God!

  30. KM Avatar
    KM

    Fr. Stephen, I have a hard time making the jump to any of this being “experience-able” rather than just abstractly philosophical (I’m struggling with this in general in your writings). You wrote:
    “It is also the case, I think, that the Kingdom of God is ‘hidden’ within our own lives. We frequently make the mistake of see ourselves only in an outward sense – ignoring the mystery of our lives.”

    I can’t seem to arrive at a place where any of these “God words”, any of the liturgy, any of the theology, feels like anything more truly substantial than us choosing to superimpose a “Christian way of thinking” on life. I can’t palpably perceive a reality in which my life means anything more than a succession of experiences, woven into my (and our collective) physical experience of the passage of time. The journey toward Christ, sanctification, etc., doesn’t seem to be anything more than, “here are the things you’re supposed to do, here are the things you aren’t supposed to do; now struggle as best you can to whatever extent your strength of will allows.”

    If I’m honest, that perspective always lurks in the background behind my professed Christianity, the more so as I grow older.

  31. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    KM,
    Yes. What you’re saying is similar (to some degree) to Simon’s description of his secularism (not as a belief, but as an experience). I’ve written (probably on the blog, but certainly in my first book) that secularism is the default position of our modern culture. It’s what feels normal and natural and is the character of our common experience. Everything that is not purely material – we presume to be part of a tutored subjectivity – something that is merely psychological.

    I would not only not argue with that experience, but, as I just noted, say that it is the default experience of our age. The question then becomes – is what I’m describing as a one-storey universe, or a sacramental view and experience of the world (or whatever terms we might apply to this) merely psychological or is there something more substantial involved?

    For my own part (and I’m no stranger to your experience in this), I begin with the witness of the resurrection of Christ. I believe that witness and believe that it truly happened and is the singular event from which my faith flows. I say that rather than to suggest that I start (or that anyone should start) somewhere else – least of all what I might feel and any given moment in time.

    But that witness, and the witness of the Church and the saints and many others across the centuries has been that the sacramental character of reality is true and real and that it can be perceived.

    This is something that has been part of my life and a driving element of my thought for some 50 years – so it’s not just recent, nor is it just a product of my Orthodox life (it was a part of my Anglican life before that).

    Perception is not a psychological trick in my experience. It does require practice and guidance (on some level). One aspect of this perception is to perceive the connectedness of all things (including our own selves) rather than seeing everything as separate and manipulable, etc. I suspect that the people who make major decisions in our culture do not perceive the dignity of human persons and their inherent worth. That’s not just a moral failure – it’s an error of perception. If they perceived the truth of things we would not be so casual about killing people with such ease (we do it all the time).

    A particular aspect of a sacramental perception is the primacy of love – towards people, towards God, towards all things.

    I think that when we imagine a sacramental perception, what we want would be some mode of seeing in which what we see “objectively” – that is with no effort whatsoever on our part – would be somehow different than the secular thing – would be almost magical and wondrous (or some such thing). But our imagined objectivity is actually a highly tutored form of subjectivity in which we’ve been schooled to objectify all things – everything, everyone is a commodity. We are taught not to love.

    So, a secular view always lurks in the background – it’s the world we’ve been taught and spoon-fed. But, I do choose to resist it and to “extend” myself towards the world, towards God, towards people, towards all things through a different perception. I have found over the years that it gets easier – but there are plenty of battles and they don’t just disappear.

    Perhaps others can share their experiences of this. Thanks for sharing yours and being honest about its struggles.

  32. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Another quick thought:

    I recall looking at pages of Greek writing back before I studied the language – same with Hebrew. I presently have that experience if I look at a page of Sanskrit or Arabic or Cunieform. However, I learned both Greek and Hebrew, and when I see them now, I see words and meaning. What my eyes see has not changed at all. But what is taking place is not merely psychological. It’s something else. Perception has a number of levels and that is one of them.

    More thoughts and examples to come…

  33. Mark Spurlock Avatar
    Mark Spurlock

    I think Father Stephen’s example of Greek writing is spot on. As far back as high school, I remember a conversation with an extraordinarily smart friend of mine who had difficulty writing papers on literary analysis for English class. He was baffled by the concepts of theme and symbolism etc., although he would come in first in the county-wide contests for geometry and calculus. I was trying to help him with a paper once, and it became clear that he thought there was some secret code that I needed to explain to him (something I and the other students good at English knew among ourselves) and then he’d be able to “get it.”

    As an adult, he enjoys literature and no longer has any trouble reading it and discussing it on more than a literal, narrative-based level. I’m not sure what (to use Father Stephen’s phrase) caused the coin to drop, but I don’t think it was anything I told him in that conversation (which was an eye-opener for me instead).

    Similarly, I have never been able to “see” as an artist can. I mean, I can appreciate visual art in a vaguely articulate way, but I could not begin to create anything worth the effort or dispute with any critic as to why one piece is good and one isn’t except in the most general sense.

    As for my own experience of trying to see holiness in creation:

    “A particular aspect of a sacramental perception is the primacy of love – towards people, towards God, towards all things.”

    ^ This, very much.

    “It does require practice and guidance (on some level). ”

    This, too. The guidance part is necessary in my own experience to help prevent self-delusion–and a degree of reassurance, perhaps even “permission.” That is, the secular view is so omnipresent and dominant in our culture that it is difficult to be in and of society without having those we respect (and our convinced of the evident sanity of) as guideposts for considering the *possibility* of something other than materialism.

  34. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Mark,
    Thank you. This is a helpful reflection.

  35. Byron Avatar
    Byron

    Similarly, I have never been able to “see” as an artist can.

    I have a college degree in Graphic Arts. From back when it was produced using a 2B pencil. During college we worked hard to shape our minds and bodies to be able to do this. It took a lot of work and practice for us to see what was in front of us and reproduce it on paper. (One exercise we did was to sit across from another student and, only looking at them–never at our paper, draw them).

    Over the years, I’ve not used the talent, at which I worked very hard, and it’s been lost. I can no longer “see” as an artist because I’m, literally, no longer an artist (in my view).

    I think this kind of “seeing” applies to so many different things but we, as a society, don’t really realize it. We think of “sight” as just “taking note of what’s in front of us”, when it is really so much more….

  36. Matthew Avatar
    Matthew

    Mark said:

    “Similarly, I have never been able to “see” as an artist can. I mean, I can appreciate visual art in a vaguely articulate way, but I could not begin to create anything worth the effort or dispute with any critic as to why one piece is good and one isn’t except in the most general sense.”

    This is my story as well. Personally, I spend way too much time in my head even though for some time now I have been trying to go into the deeper, less rational spaces. I am always looking for someone to tell me “how to do it”. I want answers that I can understand. I get anxious when I have to think outside the box in creative ways.

    Thanks so much for your thoughts Mark.

  37. Owen Kelly Avatar
    Owen Kelly

    “Perhaps others can share their experiences of this [sacramental perception].”

    Thank you, Father. I find a helpful analogy between the way poetry conveys meaning and the way creation shines with divinity. The poet Les Murray, in his work, “Poetry and Religion,” writes about the relation of these two things. Here’s an interesting (to me) excerpt. Poetry and religion are

    the same mirror:
    mobile, glancing, we call it poetry,

    fixed centrally, we call it a

    religion,
    and God is the poetry caught in
    any religion,
    caught, not imprisoned. Caught
    as in a mirror

    that he attracted, being in the
    world as poetry
    is in the poem, a law against its
    closure.
    There’ll always be religion around
    while there is poetry

    or a lack of it. Both are given, and
    intermittent,
    as the action of those birds –
    crested pigeon, rosella parrot –
    who fly with wings shut, then
    beating, and again shut.

  38. Louise Avatar
    Louise

    Thank you for this, and all your writing. I have a question–many of my friends are watching their houses burn and city destroyed in this moment. I moved from there after I found God after my daughter was born. In any case, none of the people I left behind have turned to God and I think there would be much comfort for them if they would pray. But I don’t want to appear prideful or as if I’m trying to tell them how to handle such a horrible situation. Do you have any suggestion of where to start to point a non-believer towards Truth and comfort and the Lord? Or should I stay out of it completely? Blessings, thank you.

  39. Fr. Stephen Avatar

    Louise,
    I think that we are at our best when we speak of what we ourselves do – which is what it means to “bear witness.” It’s also best if it comes at an invitation. Someone wants to know what we do (or would do). Of course, in the situation of the fires, there’s the immediate need to be generous and to share. It would be painful in the extreme if we said we were praying but offered no material help. A donation to organizations on the ground who are assisting in recovery could come with the note: “This …. comes together with my prayers for your recovery and healing.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Subscribe to blog via email

Support the work

Your generous support for Glory to God for All Things will help maintain and expand the work of Fr. Stephen. This ministry continues to grow and your help is important. Thank you for your prayers and encouragement!


Latest Comments

  1. Matthew, Sheol is a transliteration of the Hebrew. It’s not a translation. It has basically been left unrendered.

  2. Chrysostom’s use of “not particular” is, as you note, a statement that He does not belong to any particular group.…

  3. Simon, I apologize for just responding to your comment. I have not looked at the Greek for that quote. I…

  4. I’m not concerned with the translation of that particular text. The hymnological tradition of the Church makes no dogmatic distinction.…

  5. Also Fr. Stephen, I just looked at the icon of Christ´s descent into hell. It appears that Christ has a…


Read my books

Everywhere Present by Stephen Freeman

Listen to my podcast



Categories


Archives