What Is Beneath the Universe?

In the beginning was the Logos, and the Logos was with God, and the Logos was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him, and without him was not anything made that was made. John 1:1-3

+++

Throw a blanket over a chair. In all likelihood, you would recognize immediately that there is a chair beneath the contours of the fabric. The blanket is not the chair, but the chair gives shape to the blanket. This is a possible image for thinking about a certain aspect of creation – the shape it is given by the Logos. For the Christian, the shape of the universe, and everything in it, points towards something beneath, within, and throughout it. The universe is not just a lot of things; the things make “sense.” And, not surprisingly, “sense” would be one of many possible translations for the Greek word, Logos.

In our world of secular materialism, we would not tend to think that “sense” is anything other than something our thoughts do. But this begs the question: why do our thoughts make “sense” of things. Where did their “sense” come from?

The Logos does not belong to the categories of “things.” It is not a mathematical principle, nor a law of physics. But both the principles of mathematics and the laws of physics point towards something else. In Christian theology, both are just blankets covering a chair.

The witness of St. John’s gospel, and the faith of the Church, is that Jesus of Nazareth is the incarnate Logos of God, eternally begotten of the Father. Though St. John begins his gospel with this affirmation, it is not the place where our Christian faith, or theology begin. That place where what is hidden (like the chair) is revealed is in the suffering, death and resurrection of Christ, His Pascha. The proclamation, “Christ is risen,” is the affirmation of the mystery hidden from before the ages. It is the revealing of God’s good will and the definitive manifestation of His good will towards us.

When we turn from Christ’s resurrection towards creation in efforts to discern the Logos, it is Christ’s Pascha being manifest in all things that is the proper point of our attention. The Logos is not some inert principle, or property of physics, and we do wrong to examine things from that angle. If we were to pull back the blanket to see what is beneath, we would see only the risen Christ, the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.

This “shape” of the universe, or the dynamic of its shape, is called the Providence of God in Christian theology. If we look more carefully at the tradition, we will see that Providence is understood to be the Divine Energies, the “doings” of God. When human beings act, we think of ourselves as one thing and our actions as another. Indeed, sometimes we act in a way that seems to contradict our identity. We wonder, “Why did I do that?” With God it is different.

It is the teaching of the Church that God’s Essence and His Energies are one. The God who makes Himself known in His energies, is the God who is beyond knowing in His very being (essence). The manner of knowing God in His energies (actions) is one of discernment. I can discern the shape of a chair, though I do not see the chair.

Now, it is also possible for others to suggest that what we see is not a chair at all. Perhaps it is a set of boxes stacked in a chair-like manner. Perhaps it is an evil robot that is sort of shaped like a chair. Perhaps the blanket has simply landed in a manner that suggests (accidentally) the shape of a chair. All of these would represent competing narratives. Some of the suggestions are more plausible than others. The narrative of modernity would likely favor the accidental blanket account.

What is clear, however, is that debating the narratives, based on the observation of shape alone, is a no-win exercise. We see the blanket. What’s beneath it can be argued any number of ways. We do well, then, to remember that we do not start with the Prologue of John’s gospel. Had Christ traveled around Israel proclaiming, “I am the Logos through whom all things were created!” He would likely have been ignored (or worse). He does say, “I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life,” but that remains a rather opaque statement until after the resurrection. Indeed, apart from Christ’s Pascha, everything about God is opaque.

That the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world is also the eternal Logos, is a matter of revelation. It is not a result of a logical process of deduction. It is an assertion, a declaration of the nature of God and the nature of all that He has created. I often think of it as the most outrageous proclamation of the gospel possible. It flies in the face of all absurdity and meaninglessness. The Christian argument is simple: “Christ is risen.” To every objection that can be raised, we respond, “Yes, but Christ is risen.”

We do not live our lives gazing out at the universe. We are tiny things, less aware of the blanket and more aware of tiny fibers. Many times we cannot even discern the weave. We argue about the material. It is little wonder that many cannot fathom the reality of the Logos, or even grasp that shape of things. That they deny the Christian narrative is not an example of perversity: it reflects their experience. I think that many have only ever encountered arguments about blankets and chairs. Christ seems just as abstract. This is a failure in our Christian proclamation.

Our life, and our proclamation need to mirror that of the Apostles. They bore witness to Christ’s Pascha. They not only bore witness to it as an event, but accepted His way of life as the consequence of that event. We love our enemies because Christ is risen from the dead. We forgive everyone for everything because Christ is risen from the dead. We share what we have with others because Christ is risen from the dead. If, in our leisure, we ponder the shape of the universe, we do so that we might know the risen Christ. That is the end of all things.

It is rare that I reprint an article in the same year that it was written. This one (February 2019), however, came up in conversation with my beloved wife. We’ve been on vacation this week, mostly driving as we dodge an impending hurricane. Time with her is my favorite time. I’m reprinting this article because it a conversation I want to have (with readers as well).

 

About Fr. Stephen Freeman

Fr. Stephen is a retired Archpriest of the Orthodox Church in America. He is also author of Everywhere Present: Christianity in a One-Storey Universe, and Face to Face: Knowing God Beyond Our Shame, as well as the Glory to God podcast series on Ancient Faith Radio.



Posted

in

, ,

by

Comments

141 responses to “What Is Beneath the Universe?”

  1. Dee of St Hermans Avatar
    Dee of St Hermans

    Byron thank you for mentioning what your parish did regarding the prayer group during Lent. Did the group pray together as a group in church? What a wonderful way to sustain the work of repentance in Lent. I believe praying together is helpful. And I’m grateful for families that pray together. Someday, I hope that might be what happens in my own family.

  2. Dino Avatar
    Dino

    Chris
    I have heard it by different contemporary saints (like F Sophrony & Aimilianos) that the all encompassing passion of accedia is the one that has got hold of Man. Its as if the three ‘giants’ of the philokalia are rolled into one, if you’d like to look that up.
    BTW Elder Aimilianos says that the desire for three or more hours (when we truly cannot have that luxury) is absoluteely taken into account by God… How could a person whose mind is steadily set on the Heavens and whose heart desires their Maker not be blessed by Him.?

  3. Dee of St Hermans Avatar
    Dee of St Hermans

    Chris,
    I often write on my phone which takes awhile and I end up not reading something that was submitted before I finished writing.

    I apologize for not seeing your comment until now.

    I’m glad you have a prayer rule and are saying the Jesus prayer! Sometimes our experience in prayer is like that of Peter walking on water, it can be exhilarating in joy until we take our eyes off Christ and look at the water at our feet! And then we sink in the stormy waters until the Lord takes us by the hand.

    I agree with Dino, the Lord knows you yearn for Him. And I believe St Ephrem the Syrian’s prayer asks for help with ‘Akedia’ but in my prayer book it’s translated as ‘despondency’. I daily say this prayer after I first learned of it in my first experience of Lent. And indeed if I would point to one effect of modernity it would be that. I struggle with this too, which is why I say this prayer as well in my morning prayers.

    I’ll speak for myself that I too struggle through prayer. However if my life experience brings me to tears, the peace of God finally comes. And for this I’m grateful. And among the many things I have learned from this community on this blog, it’s how to be grateful for all things.

    May God bless you and I hope you continue to participate here.

  4. Paula AZ Avatar
    Paula AZ

    A couple of commentaries on current trends in academic study, its rejection of tradition, and its resultant relativism. Surely a reflection of modernity and its inability to foster substantial meaning to our culture…to life.

    https://www.firstthings.com/article/2013/01/against-great-books?utm_source=First+Things+New+Master+List&utm_campaign=7357164fe3-&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1fcb60f68e-7357164fe3-181036433

    (2nd commentary in separate post, to avoid hyperlink)

  5. Laurie Wolpert Avatar
    Laurie Wolpert

    I appreciate the responses. But I still get confused sometimes. Often in religious circles, the trend seems to be rejection/hostility towards the world and its trends. Same-sex marriage, Hollywood, social norms, etc. I get it, but at the same point, it seems hard to square with the phrase “Glory to god for all things”. Do “all things” include the things of now? If providence is at work in our lives, does God in some way “will” or “allow” modernity?

    I’m more optimistic by nature, but I also feel like every time period has its challenges. Secularism may be a lie, but few cultures appropriate the fullness of the Gospel. If we can’t be happy now, would we have been happy back then?

  6. Chris Avatar
    Chris

    Thanks Dino. What do you recommend I read? (I tried web searches on both Fr Sophrony and Elder Aimilianos, and on “three giants of the philokalia” but while many interesting things came up, I did not get that far on the texts or matters you described.) Re your encouragement again thank you. If only my mind were “steadily” set upon the Heavens. That’s my problem (or maybe the principal one of many).

    Dee, thank you for your genuine kindness here, it really comes through. I had forgotten about St Ephrem’s prayer. It really is spot on, and not just for Lent. You are right, it is just about perfect for preparation for prayer, and more generally. I can’t help but think it is actually a near perfect summation of the correct disposition towards that whole discussion of the virtues, actually. Every blessing to you.

    BTW to date in my preparation for my half hour of prayer I tend to start with the “Prayer of Preparation” as it is called from the Anglican Book of Common Prayer. While it normally gets used near the start of our Eucharistic services I have used it personally going into prayer as I have found that it summarise what I think I am trying to do, and helps get me in the right frame of mind. And it does not hurt that it is written in Cranmer’s beautiful English (note the length of the (one) sentence, but which never feels overdone because it was written with a deep aural sensibility for English. These days I rather think style apparatchiks would try to chop it to pieces for being too long.) Anyway, in case it is of any interest or use to you this is it: “Almighty God, to whom all hearts are open, desires are known, and from whom no thoughts are hidden, cleanse the thoughts of our hearts by the inspiration of your Holy Spirit that we might perfectly love you and worthily magnify your holy name, through Jesus Christ Our Lord.”

  7. Dino Avatar
    Dino

    Chris
    I cannot remember exactly where these elders have this in writing… Given our shortage of time, as well (as human expected tendency towards argumentation, rational knowledge and intellectual reverie instead of practice), I’d normally go with a meditative study of a Gospel chapter and a Psalm stanza rather than tons of Philokalic reading before prayer. As far as the philokalia goes, a classic one to start with is considered St. Nicephoros the Solitary, “Sobriety and the Guarding of the Heart”, then Kallistos and Ignatios Xanthopoulos, ‘Century’ and St Hesychios, ‘On Watchfulness and Holiness’, (Elder Aimilianos’ truly remarkable commentary on this does not yet exist in English).
    Ruminating on a small section of such writings is often better than reading tons. Then again some people prefer to read tons, be inspired and remain immersed in the world of the lives of saints as a substantial spiritual armour.

    BTW: Forgetfulness, ignorance, and laziness are the ‘three giants in St Mark the ascetic, these three are both ‘progeny as well as ‘progenitors’ of ‘akidia’, (literally: a lack of [genuine] care [for the spiritual things God instructs]). Your description of examples of this was spot on. But, regardless of these, give your heart courage and reassuring firmness no matter what…

  8. Byron Avatar
    Byron

    Dee,

    We did meet together on Sundays and discuss our week (the hour of prayer was part of a larger group activity we were involved in for Lent) and the difficulties we faced. We routinely prayed for the entire parish as well in our hour of prayer.

    Do “all things” include the things of now? If providence is at work in our lives, does God in some way “will” or “allow” modernity?

    Laurie, we glorify God for all things–including the trials we face in this time. It’s simply a fact that this is when we exist and when we live. God is evident in this time as well as in all times throughout history. Our thankfulness is in response to His revealing and grace towards all of His creation. Our responses to the issues of these times are perhaps more visceral simply because we live in them.

  9. David Waite Avatar
    David Waite

    William Wordsworth- Thank you for reminding me to read Composed a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey, On Revisiting the Banks of the Wye during a Tour. July 13, 1798 again. I return to that poem again and again. I am sure I always will.

  10. Agata Avatar
    Agata

    Chris and Dino,

    Regarding the preparation for our prayer time (first spiritual reading, then praying the prescribed prayers and the Jesus Prayer), I would like to share another recommendation I have recently found in the sources from the Russian tradition: to start with bodily prostrations.
    Prostrations (either full, if possible, or even the bending from the waist) are said to minimize the strength/force of impressions our daily experiences have on us, and sort of “clear the plate” for prayer. Of course I have heard the recommendation to do prostrations often, but never this explanation about their effect (of clearing our thoughts and feelings left in us from the day – as I understood this explanation).

    Our blog friend Lynne (who is a physical therapist) has written a wonderful article about prostrations, unfortunately I am not finding any links to it…

  11. David Waite Avatar
    David Waite

    Mary Benton – “Post-modernity would likely say you can decide for yourself whatever you think is under the blanket because we’ll never know for sure anyway,” made me laugh out loud. Thank you for that. It felt good.

    And I was very happy to read about your rewarding retreat.

    On to Gethsemani! (Where I will probably read Wordsworth, again.)

  12. David Waite Avatar
    David Waite

    Father – “When I read a letter from the Phanar, it’s flowering language is almost enough to gag an Englishman,” made me laugh out loud! Again! This is quickly becoming one of my favorite posts. You described the universe in which I live in an easily understandable way and the comments are quite enjoyable. Thank you! ‘’Tis a wonderful world, indeed.

  13. Dino Avatar
    Dino

    Agata,
    I too find that to be so vis-à-vis prostrations. Even more so when some prostrations are of candid glorification and of unpretentious thanksgiving. The blend of gratitude and humility (as in: oneself feeling an infinitely blessed debtor) both “clears the plate” and “sets the tone” for prayer.

  14. Fr. Stephen Freeman Avatar

    Laurie,
    When we give God thanks for all things – yes, that includes things that are terrible and wrong. In those cases, our thanks to God is in spite of those things and not an acquiescence to evil. It is a recognition that the goodness of God is triumphant. But God is not the author of evil. He does not create Nazis, or pedophiles, Communists or prison camps. Our giving God thanks in the face of such things is, in fact, a repudiation of their evil.

    We live now. I am not unhappy to be alive now – I (we) was born for this precise time. But, there has never been a time in 2,000 years of the Church’s history when we should have been at peace with the culture in which we found ourselves. There is no ideal period in history. I absolutely have no use for such misguided nostalgia.

    I do not teach my children to play with poisonous snakes or to walk in traffic. I do not teach them to jump off cliffs or take harmful drugs. All of those things are present – but a responsible person responds to danger with the recognition of its danger.

    What happens, I think, is that we “tune out” or make an inappropriate peace with the evil around us in order to live a “happy” or “unbothered” existence. It makes for a comfortable life. On the other hand, lots of people are dying from this stuff. I have spent 40 years of ordained ministry dealing with the ill effects of sin in our culture. I do not expect to change the culture (no one can find a single article in which I’ve ever suggested such a thing). I do, however, expect to help a few understand why they are dying and how to get well.

    I am the supreme optimist – I believe the end of all things has already arrived in our Lord’s Pascha. All things will be well. Nevertheless, we are still given the ministry of trampling down death by death – in and through Christ. That the world is going to hell in a handbasket is not cause for pessimism, unless we have been putting our hope in the wrong place. I am hopeful and totally optimistic in Christ – who is our only hope.

    But, how do we make peace with evil? Particularly if it’s only for our own peace of mind.

  15. David Waiy Avatar
    David Waiy

    Chris – Thank you for your comments about the Sabbath. I am giving them prayerful consideration and suspect that I may be changing my behavior. God bless you.

  16. Agata Avatar
    Agata

    Dino,
    The older I get, the more I am grateful and humbled by the sheer fact of still being able to do the full prostration…. 😉
    In itself, the ability to offer God a proper prostration is His great gift, I think. But we have to do our part to cooperate…

  17. Paula AZ Avatar
    Paula AZ

    David….oh it is good to laugh! I think by laughing we can laugh at ourselves at the same time. We take ourselves so seriously sometimes! I do this…like I carry the woes of the world alone on my shoulders. Oh that I should say instead ‘Bless the Lord O my soul’ !

    Father said not too long ago ‘they smile a lot at St Ann’s’ . In his comment above he says he is the supreme optimist, despite “40 years of ordained ministry dealing with the ill effects of sin in our culture”. The smiles attest to that! I say thank God for such grace! Our priest is like that too. Our congregation needs that.

    Of course there is a balance to all this. Michael Bauman commented about laughter a while back in response to my laughter at something Father said. I wish I had kept it. He compared insidious laughter against healthy laughter. There is an element of shame in all this as well.
    Anyway, thanks David. And Father, as always.

  18. Agata Avatar
    Agata

    Father,
    I have been meaning to share with you something I heard recently. The speaker said that is was Dostoevsky who remarked on the progression of human desires (based on his material wealth) in this way (maybe you know where?):

    If you give a man ‘enough’, he will desire ‘more’ (better, more comfortable). If you give him ‘better, more comfortable’, he will desire ‘exquisite/sophisticated’ (these were the words Google used for the Russian word (изысканного). If you give him the ‘exquisite/sophisticated”, he will desire the perverted (извращенного).

    It is a horrific description of what is indeed happening with the western civilization (which seems to indeed be following this path) and how the technology, medicine and science are often evolving to be at the service of this trend. Your comment to Ivan about the dangers of wealth is still sounding in my heart… and how to pray that none of our children ever become rich…

    Lord have mercy!

  19. Laurie Wolpert Avatar
    Laurie Wolpert

    Father Stephen, I agree that one should not give thanks for evil. However, the use of that word, like the word love, can be twisted in many different ways. I have cousins who refuse to celebrate Halloween and shun much of the secular world. I felt that they missed many of the good inherent in things by quickly categorizing them as “secular”, “worldly”, or “other”, if they do not fit in overtly religious categories.

    I believe it’s hard to love the world as it is, but it is the only one we have right now. I fear that withdrawing or rejecting it categorically will never help.

  20. Byron Avatar
    Byron

    Certainly we do not categorically reject the world, Laurie. We have to live in it, after all! However, we must be careful in our acceptance of what it offers (I go back to the example of the Amish, posted above).

    Halloween, to use your example, can be divisive for many. Our parish gathers together on that night and the children dress up as the most obscure Saints they can find. A committee of adults then is charged with asking them questions about the Saint and guessing which one they are! It’s a lot of fun and everyone has a great time. The manner in which one turns away is important; we should always turn towards God.

    Napoleon once said that 90% of a battle is won by picking the battlefield; we must exercise the same care in our spiritual battles.

  21. Fr. Stephen Freeman Avatar

    Laurie,
    I’m not sure how you’ve imagined that I’ve suggested rejecting “the world” categorically. However, things that are, in fact, actually sinful, regardless of how accepted they may be in a culture, remain sinful. Nonetheless, we each have to make our decisions about how we deal with the world around us.

    I’m not sure what you imagine that to entail – or to what you are reacting. I only what I’ve written. Many cultural customs, like Halloween, etc., are largely harmless matters. I don’t think I’ve ever written on them. But, I suspect your conversation would best be spent with whose words and actions you have in mind rather than in thinking that I’ve said something other than what I’ve said.

  22. Fr. Stephen Freeman Avatar

    Laurie,
    It is easily the case that someone might read into my writings things that I have not said. The notion of “religious versus secular” is a good example. I do not believe that there is any such thing as “secular,” and have made that clear from time to time. It is “secularism” that I have criticized – which is a belief that there is such a thing as “secular” – that is, a world somehow in a neutral zone, unrelated to God.

    There is no such thing.

    If someone believes that the world is religious on the one hand and secular on the other, they have already agreed to the philosophy of secularism – though probably unwittingly.

    Because there is no such thing as secular, you’ll not find me lashing out about this thing in the world or that – among the normal activities of life.

    There are, however, sinful practices (including some found within the Church), and those should be avoided and resisted. We do not hate. We do not hurt or injure. Neither do we condone what is not true or good. And that’s just a very normal Christian life. The pseudo-christian life that separates the world into religious and secular is a false mentality – not properly part of the Orthodox faith.

    But, just as there are overt religious activities or actions that would be sinful and worthy of condemnation, so there are other sorts of things elsewhere. That’s just the nature of life and it has always been that way.

    I wanted to be clear lest I be misunderstood.

  23. Laurie Wolpert Avatar
    Laurie Wolpert

    I did not mean to imply that you thought those things. I think you make pains to distinguish that on this blog and I have been interested in your writings and podcasts for some time now.

    I only note that some people who say they are rejecting evil seem quick to find it in others and the world at large. However, I don’t mean to accuse you of that and there certainly is real evil in this world, so it can be quite complicated.

  24. Fr. Stephen Freeman Avatar

    Laurie,
    These days, even the most “world-friendly” people see evil everywhere. We live in strange times.

  25. Ivan Avatar
    Ivan

    Fr. Stephen,

    The critique of modernity is probably more economic in today’s academic circles, about how the modern economy is unsustainable and tends to crash regularly besides causing great wealth and status inequality. Higher concerns than economics are less popular when the humanities are shrinking in scale so students and faculty are less aware of other aspects of modernity. And as inequality has grown, so has concern about economic justice. Modernity is often referred to when someone speaks of globalization, but it is rare in academia to hear any critique of secularism. Secularism is cherished as the modern religion, so the one-sided, justice-oriented opposition to economic modernity is ineffective.

    I think some of the Orthodox teaching that resonates with the critique of modernity has to do with the Roman empire (or any other empire) as a modernizing force in the ancient world. I am not aware of the details of early Christian history, but I have noticed it is often stated that the desert ascetics were avoiding something by fleeing the city for the desert. And the city was often an imperial capital or center, probably having more intense idolatry because the passions were highlighted by the concentration of power, wealth, and intrigue in the capitals. These days urban areas are still more secular. This rural-urban conflict also involves politics, but I think that issue is vastly misrepresented in popular media accounts so I don’t have enough correct information about it.

    Orthodoxy has a great strength in our love of monasticism. This allows for demonstration of how vibrant and loving a non-modern Christian community can be. I remember you have said that we need many more monasteries in America, and to me that seems to mean that Orthodox families need more support in teaching their children the faith so that some of them will later be truly ready for monasticism as adults. Teaching children lessons about asceticism, suffering, and sacrifice is especially difficult (and I struggled with this last school year). I look forward to the challenge of presenting enough but not too much such content in class as a church school assistant this year.

    Anthropology is mostly a humanities field, and statistically fewer Orthodox youth will choose a humanities major in college these days. Postmodernity has a highly technological concept of wisdom and truth, so the humanities are losing respect and funding. But there will be a renaissance eventually, once the worst of this era is over. I am definitely going to major in a humanities field at university, and I feel very satisfied with my study of history in community college. It’s unpopular but a culturally rich art and sweet, meaningful discipline.

    I have felt that excess wealth reduces quality of life probably ever since I heard sermons about this topic at church, early in my childhood. I learned to love ascetic poverty over the years, but also to fear the harm and suffering of cruel poverty. I suspect that wealth is dangerous in part because it gives wealthy people so much power over others, while sex also gives some power over others but much less. The biggest problem with sin in general is abuse of other living creatures, and so maybe Christ warned us about wealth so much because money leverages intentions and relationships. One psychologist whose email-newsletters I read wrote once that giving lectures about finance is much more difficult for her than speaking about sex – apparently because of the greater fear, shame, and passion involved. At the same time, Christ also urged us to be generous, with parables such as the one with the widow’s mite. That is one of my favorite Gospel parables, and it regularly motivates me to tithe more money than I would otherwise. I imagine that it should be simple enough for Christian educators to develop parable-based lesson plans, similar to what Chris shared he taught a youth group. Archbishop Dimitri (Royster)’s book, The Parables of Christ, is very helpful in this regard. I have only begun to read it but it is a very pleasant book. I read a little of it today and it reminded me to respect my own talents by working hard.

    As for making peace with evil, I have more experience in this challenge than most young people do, and the main thing I think is to love the sinner and intentionally, repeatedly, and carefully distinguish between him/her and the sin. At one point in the middle of my teenage years, I noticed that I was very angry with the Nazis of WWII, especially because of the Holocaust, and decided to forgive them. I learned more about them than just their notorious sins, and grew to see them as human beings (for example, it was a huge surprise to me that Hitler and many other Nazis were married). This is an unusual choice, but really, why not love sinners if they are the only kind of people there are on earth (setting aside gradational distinctions of different sin-identities)? So the second part I have learned by experience is to not take the perceived hierarchy of how bad sins are the wrong way (as a ranking of people) – to not judge people according to their sins, or at all. Rather to let God be the Judge – because He is the only perfect Judge. Further, St. Paul’s Epistle to the Romans, chapter 12, is sublime about this topic. To simply “let God avenge,” is such a beautiful, nonviolent choice.

  26. Ivan Avatar
    Ivan

    Chris,

    I thought acedia, also called “weariness of heart,” is more of a abnegation of life, like someone who says “why should I exercise if I’m out of shape?” than an inability to settle. I learned about acedia when I read St. John Cassian’s essay about the eight vices, and maybe Evagrius presents acedia differently than St. Cassian does. Acedia in my understanding is a deep depression, an ingratitude and rejection of opportunity and responsibility. I have not encountered this definition of acedia you refer to that involves settling before. I also think that settling can be part of acedia, when the settling is slothful or sacrifices truth, beauty, goodness, etc. for something worldly. Settling to me is more about acceptance and gratitude than lack of committment or restlessness about success. But Dino’s reply comment to you is very helpful in seeing what acedia literally and traditionally means.

    At the same time, I remember that the popular psychological method called Acceptance and Committment Therapy seems to target acedia. Acedia is difficult I think because it (usually if not always) requires a therapist’s help to recover from it- it seems that it cannot be cured without therapy. Acedia has both deep tendrils and deep roots – it can go back to childhood or intergenerational family problems. I had a severe case of acedia over the last six years, but once I fully trusted my psychologist and was able to cooperate with him much better (and at the same time he listened with an open mind and was able to understand my life and struggles), we began to accomplish much more in therapy. I feel pretty sure that I could not have recovered without his help (as a complement to the Church’s mysteries, especially taking a lot of time to contemplate my sins and prioritize which ones to confess with limited confession time and analyzing why I do them, etc.).

    The way acedia is intertwined with other passions involves both shame and energy. The hardest part of quitting a certain vice for me has been the overwhelming tiredness I feel in withdrawal – I had relied on the addiction behavior for energy, so now my soul and body must relearn how to function without it. During this relearning process the tiredness forces me to sleep too much, but I know this is partly because the devil resists my repentance. As for the shame of acedia, it powers the compensatory effort of the passions – vices are “mood-changers” used to avoid and mask pain and vulnerability. Coping skills are essential to repentance.

  27. Chris Avatar
    Chris

    Ivan,

    Thank you for your helpful (to me) points and questioning re acedia.

    I should start by saying that I am no scholar of the Fathers and many others here are in a much stronger position to explain what the actual definitions and technical situation is, and probably to contextualise it within a broader reading of the fathers (as Dino has already done).

    But in case it is useful (and again, musings to self) here’s where I was coming from for what it is worth.

    I initally referred to acedia in its full blown form as the noonday demon and said it was indeed something pretty terrible. Your notion of it being a deep depression, ingratitude and rejection of responsibility (and all the rest) is exactly what I had in mind in using the ‘full blown’ descriptor. But I think of those as symptoms of the disease in its full blown state – when the demon is in full driver’s seat mode so to speak. It’s true that was indeed suggesting that the antecedents for this are the inability to settle or be content. There is, can I suggest, some pretty clear support for this in Cassian’s reporting of Abba Serapion who is quoted as saying “There are two kinds of acedia (anxiety or weariness of heart). One makes those who are seething with emotion fall asleep. The other encourages a person to abandon his home and to flee.” The reference to abandoning and fleeing is the loss of an ability to stay in one spot. As another source, this page https://logismoitouaaron.blogspot.com/2010/03/demon-of-noondayst-cassian-evagrius-on.html has a very helpful and long quote from The Institutes that is interesting that is entirely on topic.

    That said, I like to think about Cassian stuff in the broader context of what I thought he was trying to do. Forgive me if the following is either known to you or comes across as a bit naff, but I think it is useful for a contextual understanding – and in any event I think put this way helps underscore some parallels to our modern situation. Cassian and his buddy Germanus, products of an educated early 4th century late empire upper to middle class, had grown despairing of what they felt was an increasingly conventional and not particularly authentic spirituality and wanted to find the Real Thing. They set off to the East to search for it (sound familiar? :-)). (That is perhaps not surprising as once Constantine declared Christianity as official religion all the conventional types in society, including the upwardly mobile types, would have started moving in and would need to have been accommodated.) The desert fathers movement/phenomenon was surely a counter-cultural reaction to growing lack of authenticity – thank goodness! Anyway, Cassian and Germanus tried a few things and mainly found them wanting, including a particularly terrible experience at a monastery in Jerusalem which had already fallen into moral decay. They eventually made it to the deserts of Egypt and finally realised after talking to lots of monks and fathers (and indeed mothers) that they had indeed found the Real Thing. The Conferences reported on their experiences (including back to those in the outside world) and I have thought were mainly directed towards the topic of how to pray per Conferences IX and X.

    Anyway, Cassian and Germain clearly talked to lots of people and must have seen lots of different outcomes among the more than 5000 monks and hermits in a range of largely experimental communities there. There can be little doubt that some of the things they saw or heard about would have been about some monks who had not succeeded, or perhaps had just gone stir crazy. One class of those would have been the monks who had fallen into a kind of quiet despair, or who had just run away unable to cope with their lot. Why might this have happened?

    I find it of most use to try and imagine my way into this through a real world scenario for a newish monk in the desert. He is sitting outside his cave in the morning, weaving his baskets or whatever to try and make his living. It’s 10 AM and the sun is already hot and rising. His mind starts to wander. “Gee, it’s getting hot. More baskets – baskets day in, day out. How am I going to sell these? And what does this basket making have to do with my spiritual growth anyway which is why I came here? And how is my spiritual growth going anyway? I don’t seem to be making much progress. Abba X who is my guide says some things that I like, but I don’t always get what he is saying, and in any event he just seems a bit beyone me. Now Abba Y down the road, he seems to be more holy and his disciples seem to be making more progress. Maybe I should go down there and be with him. Gee it’s getting really hot. These baskets are getting me down. And John my neighbour in the next cave to me is often so annoying. I wish they would move him on. Oh that is such an uncharitable though. I am such a loser though for thinking all these thoughts. And I think I am trying to be holy. Why do I even bother, I am such a disaster. Oh I wish God would help me. Lord help me. Lord where are you? What is the point of all of this. No, no, I should not think like that. I should be thinking holy thoughts. I know spending three hours this afternoon in the cave praying will be good for me, but I don’t know.” And so on. The ideas is how the trains of thought and fantasy and so on might develop, especially in a situation like this.

    And now imagine if this happened day-in-day out for a while. What would happen? A monk who was not that well grounded, or directed, or was immature, or maybe just unlucky would indeed start to go a bit crazy. That craziness would probably manifest as growing depression if he felt he was a failure, but was trying to persist anyway. Or as listlessness as he started to lose interest and enthusiasm and was giving up, possibly with an internalised sense of shame. Or he might just run away, either deciding that this wasn’t the life for him, or that he just couldn’t take it any more. That’s what I think full blown acedia must have looked like and it would just have been very real. Evagrius called it the noonday demon in part referencing the hottest part of the day which was presumably the time of day under the desert sun when all of the stir crazy reactions and behaviours became most obvious. But presumably there was also quiet desperation too.

    But again, why would some monks have been ‘successful’ while other monks where taken out by this demon? Per my imagined monologue, I rather suspect this particular demon grows and gets a hold through speculation : it is a train of thoughts and actions thing. Its starting point, though, surely is an inability to find an effective way to deal with one’s own feelings of discomfort, dissatisfaction discontentment and disappointment (all those dis-es!) that can really be boiled down to not being happy where one actually is and/or with one’s circumstances.

    So that to me is what acedia at its root is – ‘I am dissatisfied with where I am (and as part of that probably who I am and my circumstances)’. But I may not even know this at least at the start – it all seems so reasonable. Acedia in this way is one of those sneaky things (like, as I said, shame and resentment) that is often really hard to see, or see properly, let alone effectively deal with. But that surely that kind of discontentment is one of the roots of pretty much all sinful behaviours. E.g. if I feel content and full, I am unlikely to go out obsessing about food (and food WAS something a desert monk would almost certainly fantasise about in ways that we probably can’t really understand).

    I find it interesting that in the Order of St Benedict (and btw Benedict knew Cassian, and at the end of the Rule specifically encourages his monks to read Cassian) the third vow that monks need to take is a vow of stability. Benedict specifically (in chapter 4) calls the monastery “God’s Workshop” because it is a place of developing virtue and mending vice precisely because it was a place you could not escape from, and nor could you escape from your fellow monks. You had to figure out how to make it work. All the elements of his Rule are designed to get that to happen. The Benedictine stability vow is noteworthy in part because that one is not there in some of the other western religious orders, notably the Franciscans who are, in keeping with its mendicant vibe, are not supposed to be tied to a place.

    I have been thinking about this acedia business since Dino posted about the three giants in St Mark the Ascetic, which was VERY helpful (thank you Dino!). I am thinking that yes, St Mark was very perceptive indeed – the inability to be content with where one is does come about by a corrosive process in which forgetfulness, ignorance and laziness (FIL) sort of work together over time. And once the process of unmooring starts (which is a key aspect of discontentment with one’s circumstances) then in turn all those three FIL things will accelerate. This is one demon where just toughing it out in full warrior mode is probably not going to work, one needs to be agile, perceptive and kind, and have good guidance because these things are just hard. And again Abba Moses’ idea that your cell will teach you everything is looking good – with care.

    My other thought has been about my own rather throw away remark about the serpent’s pitch to Eve. Actually the more I think about it this is exactly the process the serpent used. Eve starts off in a great place, is quite content, and is in a good relationship with God. The serpent first has to make her discontented – and the slyness with which that is done is a key. It is only then that she sees the forbidden fruit as desirable … Maybe that is one reason why the Fathers Dino cites say that the all encompassing passion of accedia is the one that has got hold of man. Maybe it is because it was there as a root cause at the start.

    Finally, the context of the discussion was what does any of that mean for modernity. We do not face the deprivations of the desert monks, if anything we have an undreamt of before in human history abundance of both time and money (even if the way it is distributed is still a somewhat shocking thing). But we are not content. The mini examples I gave in my acedia comment was meant to illustrate briefly some of that. The imagined monkish inner monologue took the form it did because many of those things (ok, not the baskets :-)) still happen, at least to me. Weirdly, loads of leisure and freedom to do whatever we want – and go wherever we want – ironically supercharges the lack of ability to settle by turning it into what is to be desired … And on top of that marketing and consumerism are specifically designed – serpent like – to make us discontent and then see the other demons as desirable solutions to the itch. Oh most subtle and clever demon – and you even managed to cover up your name!

    What to do about it? Reflecting on my previous meanderings, I have found that phrase “sabboatical sensibility” to be the one that has stuck most. That’s what I think I want -with the Lord’s help – to develop, in part to help deal with this very-hard-to-see demon. The Lord says giving me (and yourselves) one day in seven (keeping it genuinely and positvely hotly, rather than turning it into another set of rules that will be a source of dicontentment and instability) is a key to becoming, for want of a better word, righteous.

    Again, sorry for that particularly long ramble. By now you will be getting a sense of how my rather odd (unsettled?!) mind can approach things – sorry! Again, much of that was articulating things to myself. Shared in case it’s of use, and to explain, Ivan, where I was coming from. So genuinely thank you again for raising this. As you can probably tell, I have found it helpful to put this down. I do reiterate though that this is mainly coming from a relatively unread place so very likely to be wholly or partly incorrect. Please take any real guidance from sources better grounded in the traditions of the Church who actually know what they are talking about!

  28. Chris Avatar
    Chris

    Oh and Ivan, I forgot to say that I also found your discussion of your personal experiences about dealing with withdrawal from vices to be both interesting and very authentic – and indeed the most useful part of the post for me. I think you are right. Fighting demons, particularly addictions (and I suffer from many), even if cleverly is hard work, and is tiring, which is maybe why so many people either don’t bother or give up (again, me, alas). Perhaps that’s one reason why we have to be clear about the benefits of living out of love in and for the Lord, not out of spiritual materialism, but just as a practical and humble acknowledgement of the psychological realities. Yes, repentance – and indeed ongoing conversion – is hard, but hopefully happy – work!

  29. Fr. Stephen Freeman Avatar

    Ivan,
    I suspect you’re right about the economic angle – for one, it’s the easiest. I have gathered that the social sciences and humanities are increasingly infested with ideologies of voguish things such as the sexual/gender/racial agendas. I see lots of articles on the difficulties surrounding this.

    The two places where I have seen good material on the critique of modernity has been in philosophy (Alasdair MacIntyre, Stanley Hauerwas, Charles Taylor, et al) and some corners of theology. My own interest is simply in describing the popular world and its dominant ideas and how it distorts our knowledge of God. Its roots and structures, etc., are really only of interest as they serve that point for me.

    That we might know God (and the fullness of what that means) is pretty much all that interests me. Of course, since that is the whole of our life, it’s a broad interest!

  30. Byron Avatar
    Byron

    The biggest problem with sin in general is abuse of other living creatures, and so maybe Christ warned us about wealth so much because money leverages intentions and relationships.

    We should not forget the abuse of ourselves, especially in light of the discussion on acedia. Finances are almost always a self-focused dilemma. These things continually affect us, and relationships with others, in ways we both recognize and ignore. We are cut from whole cloth.

  31. Dino Avatar
    Dino

    Chris
    It is probably little help for others but for me the greatest help by far against the demon of accedia as you portrayed it was a simple ‘word’. I say of little help to others because it’s not the ‘word’ that had the power to liberate but the ‘authority’ (Mark 1 :22) of the one who spoken it to me. It was simply: ‘you will have this, pay it no heed’. But with a simple yet divine ‘assignment’ (that gives you utter confidence to carry on – the “license” to ignore that demon that presses you so subtly, often ‘from the right’ not to be ignored.)
    St Gregory the Theologian somewhere says that the highest possible ‘act’ a man can perform is the ‘nothing’ of stillness under the Lord’s gaze.
    However that is quite ‘monkish’ (internal) whereas the prevalent accedia version in ‘the world’ is far more based on external stimuli towards restlessness.

  32. Christopher Avatar
    Christopher

    “…..That being the case, I would suggest that understanding all of this and thinking carefully about it, is an essential task for Orthodox thought in the present time. It’s happening here and there – not nearly on the level that it should. I sometimes feel like a voice in the wilderness. When I read modernism disguised as Orthodoxy (for example in the work coming out of the Orthodox studies program at Fordham) I see the deadliest threat – with the most innocent of intentions…..The two places where I have seen good material on the critique of modernity has been in philosophy (Alasdair MacIntyre, Stanley Hauerwas, Charles Taylor, et al) and some corners of theology….”

    I have said this before Fr. but I also sometimes think you are ‘a voice in the wilderness’ as it were as well. Orthodoxy is “new” as it were to secularism and the intellectual/theological/cultural circumstance of the west, but it is past time that we start grappling with this in an earnest way. Florvorsky, Schemman, and others started to but we have to continue this work.

    Over the last year or so have been perusing academic papers on Florvorsky and his “neo-patristic synthesis” idea. What I have discovered is that many (most really) get him wrong one way or another on this. The “how” of these erroneous interpretations is interesting, because more often than not it involves some unexamined modern/secular assumption around epistemology, history, and/or anthropology (and thus ecclesiology). Most of the current Orthodox academic work around theological anthropology is done by the modernist Fordham type and not work reading at all.

    There are some I respect in the Church who believe that this is just part and parcel of the modern(ist) academic and intellectual scene. I however tie it back to the larger cultural circumstances of the Church, and thus to the “average” person standing next to you in any given parish on any given Sunday. In other words, the secularism in the parish flows up to Orthodox academic/inteligencia, not the other way around (though that happens as well).

    In any case keep up the good work.

  33. Fr. Stephen Freeman Avatar

    Christopher,
    Thanks! I know that I “formally” stand outside the Orthodox academy, but I know that I am read within the academy (’cause I get notes from various professors from time to time). I think the lack of understanding and proper critique of modernity in our present training and doing of formal theology is the single greatest danger of its sort in our time. If a theologian is tone-deaf to this issue, then they are tone-deaf to the entire culture they are addressing, and will unknowingly become a conduit of its ideas.

    If you are not consciously aware of how the culture affects your thought – then you simply lack discernment and your mind (nous) has not been “renewed” in the language of St. Paul. I.e., one is not yet fit to do theology (in this formal sense).

    I engage in these conversations (behind the scenes) so that I know that others have, at least, some awareness. I suspect that they read my stuff because that awareness is important to them.

    I’m a little flawed as a voice – I have my own limitations. I pray that other voices will continue to be raised up and that mine will be but the least footnote in an otherwise loud voice of discernment.

    Florovsky clearly saw and understood much more than people give him credit for. Schmemann’s For the Life of the World is probably the single most important Orthodox work of our time – and he really did not intend it to be so. But his identification of the nature and problem of secularity is magisterial. I’ve often said that my book is just For the Life of the World warmed over by a Southern red-neck.

    It’s ironic that many of those who would invoke Schmemann’s name most fondly, do so as a mask for revisionism that is, in fact, utterly secular in nature. That’s tragic. But – life is what it is.

  34. Dee of St Hermans Avatar
    Dee of St Hermans

    Father Stephen thank you for your words to Laurie. They were helpful for me, as well. In them you describe the distinction in speech between describing the ‘secular world’ and secularism. And I often make a reference to the ‘secular world’ when I describe the western cultural mindset and behavior. But this can be confusing, as you say, because there is no ‘secular world’ in reality.

    I don’t know the Fordham theology but grateful for the ‘heads up’. I will say as discreetly as I can that there are priests who write books and have ‘blurbs’ in various forms through the Ancient Faith website. I note at least one or two (converts) actually ‘preach’ heresy. Thanks be to God I checked with my confessor about these ideas they preached and he confirmed they were heretical. So I asked him how ‘do they get way with this’ without formal corrections? His answer was that their presence (in heretical thoughts) was like a splinter in the finger that will slowly be worked out. God willing.

    For this reason I’m somewhat pedantic with the catechumens and strongly caution them to focus on this blog rather than the smorgasbord of offerings in other places.

    Dino, the words you mention to Chris are helpful in many ways. ‘Ignore them’. Simple yet powerful. These are the words of my confessor in similar circumstances. Obsessions are another vehicle reinforced in this modernist culture. The struggle in itself can unintentionally and reinforce obsessive characteristics in the direction ‘of the right’ as you say. And similarly a looseness, almost a carelessness, is the product of a nonchalant or laissez faire attitude as well (an assault from the left I presume).

    Chris your description of acedia, I thought, was very illustrative.

  35. Dee of St Hermans Avatar
    Dee of St Hermans

    In the ‘world’ were I often work, there is a perception of me in which wearing the cross as I now do outwardly is a ‘contrast’ in image to the subject I teach. It’s perceived as almost a schizophrenia— a split personality in which I must struggle to remain sane. As a result neither the science I do nor the ‘religion’ ( their words) I profess can be taken seriously. In the latter case it is perceived as an empty ‘gesture’ having no meaning or consequence in the ‘real world’ other than its potential to cause conflict and ‘ useless magical thinking’.

  36. Dino Avatar
    Dino

    Dee
    The supposedly schizophrenic ‘contrast’ the world charges you with is what many respectable ‘confessors’ get accused of. It reminds me of a peculiar ‘cognitive dissonance’ that many intellectually haughty secularists encounter when they encounter certain mind-bogglingly well-educated monks in Athos, when they assumed that only life’s disheartened losers become monks there…
    It really throws them – no matter what they say outwardly.

  37. Dana Ames Avatar
    Dana Ames

    Dee,
    may the power of the Lord’s Cross uphold you!
    Dana

  38. Paula AZ Avatar
    Paula AZ

    Dee… Amen to Dana’s blessing to you.
    Your work and your faith that is not taken seriously, I know you are utmost serious about. You bear a cross Christ has given you. Remember the shame and humiliation He bore and the strength given Him by the Father, and even the ministering angels. He shall give you strength to endure, as one of His.

  39. Michael Bauman Avatar
    Michael Bauman

    Father, I have come to believe that many voices are not only ignorant of the current culture but of our actual history. It seems to me that others prefer an historically ignorant sentimentalism masquerading as so called Tradition to the actual thing. Such an approach is just as deadly as secularism. In fact it is part of it.

  40. Matthew W Avatar

    Chris,

    Its funny, I grew up a Sabbatarian, within a Sabbatarian culture engendered by the Second Great Awakening in America, and had to read this blog before I really understood Sabbatarianism.

    https://glory2godforallthings.com/2018/02/22/the-justice-of-creation/

    I personally find your public musings thought provoking, and valuable to my thinking. Thank-you for your participation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Subscribe to blog via email

Support the work

Your generous support for Glory to God for All Things will help maintain and expand the work of Fr. Stephen. This ministry continues to grow and your help is important. Thank you for your prayers and encouragement!


Latest Comments

  1. “Grace is very inventive!” — indeed! And well said, Fr. Stephen! Christ is Born! Glorify Him! Merry Christmas to you…

  2. Matthew, I think that purity of heart (the slow, patient acquisition of virtue) is a primary path. However, it is…

  3. Matthew, Yes. They were Christians. They were nominal Baptists (off-and-on attenders, not Bible students, not people of prayer) who had…

  4. A total irrelevancy but it keeps recurring in my heart: a brief conversation between two characters in the play by…


Read my books

Everywhere Present by Stephen Freeman

Listen to my podcast



Categories


Archives